Amid allegations of security leaks over the indigenous submarine program, a legislator was accused of feeding sensitive information to a third nation, resulting in the arrests of engineers by overseas agents and action against a foreign contractor that helped build the first vessel.
Legislators are not the only people who work at the Legislative Yuan, so even with closed-door meetings, there is no guarantee that secrets would not leak.
Every information leak potentially poses a huge threat to national security, whether it is due to political interests, ineptitude or dereliction of duty.
Under normal circumstances, lawmakers would not pay attention to sensitive information from administrative institutions. Their role is to focus on a wide range of major policy issues related to their professional backgrounds.
Given this, the legislature’s Foreign and National Defense Committee should read through sensitive information provided by the Ministry of National Defense and pass on only what is necessary. That would help prevent national security risks due to a lack of discipline among lawmakers.
In advanced democracies, parliamentary systems center on standing committees, normally consisting of senior lawmakers with backgrounds related to a committee’s nature.
In Taiwan, the legislature is controlled by party caucuses, and it does not pay so much attention to the nature and aim of each committee.
The allegations against the Foreign and National Defense Committee lawmaker have been filed, with a prosecution possible.
The incident should be a warning to party leaders to think twice about whom they nominate as lawmakers. The capabilities and character of potential legislators should be carefully considered, especially the history and professional background of those who are put on committees.
Taiwan was given a “B” in the Government Defence Integrity Index compiled by Transparency International UK’s Transparency International Defence and Security program, which said that Taiwan’s “parliamentary oversight is well established and effective,” but added that its defense committee members are not professional enough and there is a risk of corruption.
However, this issue is out of the hands of the Ministry of National Defense — it can only be solved by political parties.
Tsao Yao-chun is a researcher with the Chinese Association of Public Affairs Management and an expert in evaluating international government integrity.
Translated by Rita Wang
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s