For the past 16 years, South Africa has grappled with an acute energy crisis characterized by rolling blackouts, some lasting as long as 15 hours a day. In February, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa declared a national “state of disaster” and announced a bailout of the state-owned electricity company, Eskom. However, the government’s failure to maintain a stable power supply has already had a profoundly negative effect on South Africans’ daily lives, especially on the lives of women and girls.
The recurring nationwide power outages, euphemistically known as “load shedding,” have plagued South Africa since 2007. Given that most South Africans depend on essential state-provided infrastructure — as of 2021, 77.7 percent of the country’s households relied primarily on electricity for cooking — this crisis has hit homemakers especially hard.
Load shedding is implemented in several stages, with each stage signifying the removal of an additional 1 gigawatt of electricity from the grid. The first stage involves “three two-hour power outages over four days or three four-hour power outages over eight days,” while in the sixth stage, consumers “could be affected 18 times for four days for up to four-and-a-half hours at a time or 18 times over eight days for about two hours at a time.”
Illustration: Mountain People
In addition to denying South African women access to essential infrastructure, the electricity crisis has compromised their safety. Recurring blackouts have been a boon for criminals, enabling them to steal cables — thereby prolonging the power outages — and terrorize people in their homes and neighborhoods. With streets and homes left unlit and security systems rendered ineffective, burglaries, vehicles thefts and robberies have surged.
In March, a 27-year-old veterinarian was murdered outside his Cape Town home by criminals tampering with his car during a load-shedding episode.
While law-enforcement authorities in South Africa say that they have not observed an increase in distress calls due to load shedding, numerous reports of sexual violence against women and children tell a different story.
In one particularly horrifying case, a two-year-old girl was raped by her uncle during a power outage. Given that women are already vulnerable in public spaces, the electricity crisis has severely limited their mobility both outside and inside their homes.
The technological advances of the past century, particularly the introduction of the washing machine, have transformed women’s lives, liberating them from time-consuming household chores and facilitating their entry into the labor force. Yet, even with many traditional services offered by the state, women and girls often find themselves stepping in to fill gaps where public services are insufficient or absent.
For example, they tend to assume the responsibility of caring for sick family members who lack proper access to healthcare. Similarly, when a household lacks amenities such as running water or electricity, the burden falls disproportionately on them.
By hindering women’s ability to use time-saving appliances such as ovens, microwaves and washing machines to perform basic household chores, the electricity crisis has adversely affected young girls’ school performance and limited women’s employment opportunities, thereby threatening to erase decades of economic and social progress.
Moreover, the load-shedding crisis serves as a reminder of women’s invaluable economic and social contributions. Despite the government’s ongoing failure to deliver basic public goods, South African children and adults have continued to receive sustenance and care. Given the gendered division of labor within the typical household, this critical work is mostly carried out by women and girls, often overlooked — and unpaid.
As the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated, the load-shedding crisis has exacerbated South Africa’s existing gender and racial inequalities. Such crises not only reverse the progress made by women during more prosperous times, but also diminish their ability to bounce back by forcing them out of the labor market and impeding their education.
For those who can afford it, there are ways to mitigate this crisis. One option is to go fully or partly off the grid, but this requires a significant initial investment and is thus inaccessible to many low-income households. Another option is to buy prepared meals or send laundry out to alleviate the burden of housework, which also requires financial resources and time that many impoverished families simply do not have. Households unable to access these alternative services are thus left without a viable solution, exacerbating existing inequalities.
To ensure equitable outcomes, South African policymakers must guarantee that reliable and sustainable electricity is available to everyone. To this end, adopting a fairer load-shedding strategy that considers socioeconomic factors is crucial. For example, the state-owned monopoly could reduce power outages in poorer neighborhoods.
The ongoing electricity crisis has underscored the rampant corruption and inefficiency that plague South Africa. Unless the government adopts a more equitable strategy for conserving electricity, women’s well-being would continue to be disproportionately affected, further highlighting the discriminatory misogynistic logic underlying the country’s inadequate public services.
Odile Mackett is a feminist labor economist and a senior lecturer at the University of the Witwatersrand’s School of Governance.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022