For the past 16 years, South Africa has grappled with an acute energy crisis characterized by rolling blackouts, some lasting as long as 15 hours a day. In February, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa declared a national “state of disaster” and announced a bailout of the state-owned electricity company, Eskom. However, the government’s failure to maintain a stable power supply has already had a profoundly negative effect on South Africans’ daily lives, especially on the lives of women and girls.
The recurring nationwide power outages, euphemistically known as “load shedding,” have plagued South Africa since 2007. Given that most South Africans depend on essential state-provided infrastructure — as of 2021, 77.7 percent of the country’s households relied primarily on electricity for cooking — this crisis has hit homemakers especially hard.
Load shedding is implemented in several stages, with each stage signifying the removal of an additional 1 gigawatt of electricity from the grid. The first stage involves “three two-hour power outages over four days or three four-hour power outages over eight days,” while in the sixth stage, consumers “could be affected 18 times for four days for up to four-and-a-half hours at a time or 18 times over eight days for about two hours at a time.”
Illustration: Mountain People
In addition to denying South African women access to essential infrastructure, the electricity crisis has compromised their safety. Recurring blackouts have been a boon for criminals, enabling them to steal cables — thereby prolonging the power outages — and terrorize people in their homes and neighborhoods. With streets and homes left unlit and security systems rendered ineffective, burglaries, vehicles thefts and robberies have surged.
In March, a 27-year-old veterinarian was murdered outside his Cape Town home by criminals tampering with his car during a load-shedding episode.
While law-enforcement authorities in South Africa say that they have not observed an increase in distress calls due to load shedding, numerous reports of sexual violence against women and children tell a different story.
In one particularly horrifying case, a two-year-old girl was raped by her uncle during a power outage. Given that women are already vulnerable in public spaces, the electricity crisis has severely limited their mobility both outside and inside their homes.
The technological advances of the past century, particularly the introduction of the washing machine, have transformed women’s lives, liberating them from time-consuming household chores and facilitating their entry into the labor force. Yet, even with many traditional services offered by the state, women and girls often find themselves stepping in to fill gaps where public services are insufficient or absent.
For example, they tend to assume the responsibility of caring for sick family members who lack proper access to healthcare. Similarly, when a household lacks amenities such as running water or electricity, the burden falls disproportionately on them.
By hindering women’s ability to use time-saving appliances such as ovens, microwaves and washing machines to perform basic household chores, the electricity crisis has adversely affected young girls’ school performance and limited women’s employment opportunities, thereby threatening to erase decades of economic and social progress.
Moreover, the load-shedding crisis serves as a reminder of women’s invaluable economic and social contributions. Despite the government’s ongoing failure to deliver basic public goods, South African children and adults have continued to receive sustenance and care. Given the gendered division of labor within the typical household, this critical work is mostly carried out by women and girls, often overlooked — and unpaid.
As the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated, the load-shedding crisis has exacerbated South Africa’s existing gender and racial inequalities. Such crises not only reverse the progress made by women during more prosperous times, but also diminish their ability to bounce back by forcing them out of the labor market and impeding their education.
For those who can afford it, there are ways to mitigate this crisis. One option is to go fully or partly off the grid, but this requires a significant initial investment and is thus inaccessible to many low-income households. Another option is to buy prepared meals or send laundry out to alleviate the burden of housework, which also requires financial resources and time that many impoverished families simply do not have. Households unable to access these alternative services are thus left without a viable solution, exacerbating existing inequalities.
To ensure equitable outcomes, South African policymakers must guarantee that reliable and sustainable electricity is available to everyone. To this end, adopting a fairer load-shedding strategy that considers socioeconomic factors is crucial. For example, the state-owned monopoly could reduce power outages in poorer neighborhoods.
The ongoing electricity crisis has underscored the rampant corruption and inefficiency that plague South Africa. Unless the government adopts a more equitable strategy for conserving electricity, women’s well-being would continue to be disproportionately affected, further highlighting the discriminatory misogynistic logic underlying the country’s inadequate public services.
Odile Mackett is a feminist labor economist and a senior lecturer at the University of the Witwatersrand’s School of Governance.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,