Pig price hogwash
On March 11, the price of live pigs at auction reached NT$90 (US$2.79) per kilogram — the highest in the past 40 years. At about the same time, the US Grains Council and the Taiwan Feed Industry Association said that the supply and prices of animal feed had not fully recovered from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the war between Russia and Ukraine.
They said that with animal feed prices remaining high, the high cost of raising pigs had lifted the price of pork, and this was likely to continue.
Overall, the cost of pork production cannot return to previous levels and will inevitably be reflected in prices.
However, to stabilize domestic pork prices, the Ministry of Agriculture instructed the National Animal Industry Foundation to use limited-time and limited-amount pork import incentives to quickly replenish Taiwan’s security stocks and provide imported pork for processing.
The foundation implemented import incentives from May to last month.
Importers received NT$6 per kilogram to help cover procurement, warehousing, management and marketing expenses to help maintain a stable auction price for live pigs in Taiwan, meet demand and set people’s minds at rest, it said.
Although the price of live pigs per kilogram has increased since April, the stabilization measures have kept domestic auction prices within the “green light zone” while ensuring reasonable profits for pig farmers.
Clearly, the policy has achieved the desired result.
However, at a news conference organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus on Thursday last week, KMT Legislator Wu I-ding (吳怡玎) said that the foundation’s NT$6 per kilogram subsidy cost NT$300 million and no benefits have been seen.
The price of pork did not fluctuate during this period, while imports rose dramatically, Wu said.
A dictionary would say that the opposite of “fluctuation” is “stability.” So when Wu said that there has been no fluctuation in the price of pork during the period, surely it means that the price of pork in Taiwan was stable, which is exactly what was supposed to happen.
How can she claim that she has not seen any result?
Is there something wrong with her eyesight, or is she just talking hogwash?
Chueh Li
Taipei
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,