Pig price hogwash
On March 11, the price of live pigs at auction reached NT$90 (US$2.79) per kilogram — the highest in the past 40 years. At about the same time, the US Grains Council and the Taiwan Feed Industry Association said that the supply and prices of animal feed had not fully recovered from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the war between Russia and Ukraine.
They said that with animal feed prices remaining high, the high cost of raising pigs had lifted the price of pork, and this was likely to continue.
Overall, the cost of pork production cannot return to previous levels and will inevitably be reflected in prices.
However, to stabilize domestic pork prices, the Ministry of Agriculture instructed the National Animal Industry Foundation to use limited-time and limited-amount pork import incentives to quickly replenish Taiwan’s security stocks and provide imported pork for processing.
The foundation implemented import incentives from May to last month.
Importers received NT$6 per kilogram to help cover procurement, warehousing, management and marketing expenses to help maintain a stable auction price for live pigs in Taiwan, meet demand and set people’s minds at rest, it said.
Although the price of live pigs per kilogram has increased since April, the stabilization measures have kept domestic auction prices within the “green light zone” while ensuring reasonable profits for pig farmers.
Clearly, the policy has achieved the desired result.
However, at a news conference organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus on Thursday last week, KMT Legislator Wu I-ding (吳怡玎) said that the foundation’s NT$6 per kilogram subsidy cost NT$300 million and no benefits have been seen.
The price of pork did not fluctuate during this period, while imports rose dramatically, Wu said.
A dictionary would say that the opposite of “fluctuation” is “stability.” So when Wu said that there has been no fluctuation in the price of pork during the period, surely it means that the price of pork in Taiwan was stable, which is exactly what was supposed to happen.
How can she claim that she has not seen any result?
Is there something wrong with her eyesight, or is she just talking hogwash?
Chueh Li
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS