Pig price hogwash
On March 11, the price of live pigs at auction reached NT$90 (US$2.79) per kilogram — the highest in the past 40 years. At about the same time, the US Grains Council and the Taiwan Feed Industry Association said that the supply and prices of animal feed had not fully recovered from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the war between Russia and Ukraine.
They said that with animal feed prices remaining high, the high cost of raising pigs had lifted the price of pork, and this was likely to continue.
Overall, the cost of pork production cannot return to previous levels and will inevitably be reflected in prices.
However, to stabilize domestic pork prices, the Ministry of Agriculture instructed the National Animal Industry Foundation to use limited-time and limited-amount pork import incentives to quickly replenish Taiwan’s security stocks and provide imported pork for processing.
The foundation implemented import incentives from May to last month.
Importers received NT$6 per kilogram to help cover procurement, warehousing, management and marketing expenses to help maintain a stable auction price for live pigs in Taiwan, meet demand and set people’s minds at rest, it said.
Although the price of live pigs per kilogram has increased since April, the stabilization measures have kept domestic auction prices within the “green light zone” while ensuring reasonable profits for pig farmers.
Clearly, the policy has achieved the desired result.
However, at a news conference organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus on Thursday last week, KMT Legislator Wu I-ding (吳怡玎) said that the foundation’s NT$6 per kilogram subsidy cost NT$300 million and no benefits have been seen.
The price of pork did not fluctuate during this period, while imports rose dramatically, Wu said.
A dictionary would say that the opposite of “fluctuation” is “stability.” So when Wu said that there has been no fluctuation in the price of pork during the period, surely it means that the price of pork in Taiwan was stable, which is exactly what was supposed to happen.
How can she claim that she has not seen any result?
Is there something wrong with her eyesight, or is she just talking hogwash?
Chueh Li
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS