Two recent incidents were hotly debated on social media for their association with the so-called ACGN subculture — animation, comics, games and novels. The common theme was a philosophical debate concerning the “utility” of culture.
In the preface of his new book, Keep Promise (漫畫柯文哲), Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) wrote that comics seem to be for children and merely a source of humor for adults, but are never a medium for anything major.
However, his campaign office was forced to backtrack after the comment was criticized, saying that it was “not their intention” to disrespect or denigrate the Taiwanese comic industry.
The next day, the Ministry of Education released a commercial about the National Childcare Policy for Ages 0-6. The 30-second video depicted a married couple with two young children returning to the father’s family home to visit their grandmother.
The father asked his mother to do him a favor, saying he had bought action figures that would be delivered to her home the next day.
Handing her some cash, he asked her to pay the delivery person when the toys arrived.
The mother replied scornfully: “What? Are you still playing with those figures?”
She then used the money to buy what she called “more meaningful” things for her grandchildren — educational books and toys.
Democratic Progressive Party legislative candidate Justin Wu (吳崢) said that the video was discriminatory.
Amid a furor, the ministry pulled the video and apologized for causing offense to or disrespecting the animation and action figure industry.
While a lot of discussion online and in the media has focused on the ignorance, misunderstandings and discrimination involved in the incidents, the crux of the problem is that Ko and the ministry regard pop culture as having utility only when it is embedded with value.
The targeting of ACGN culture could have been easily been focused on celebrity culture, street culture or LGBTQ culture. Culture is a set of daily norms, symbols and signs arising from the material conditions and ideology of a group. Pop culture shifts under the drive of capitalism.
Nevertheless, if an ideology gains utility, it gives rise to “useful” texts, although they do not constitute a culture.
Cultures are founded on non-essentials, which is why they have the capacity to become symbols and norms that people follow. Cultures form because of a lack of utility and become useless the moment they are bestowed with purpose.
Why would the ministry publish such a discriminatory video? The script must have been inspired by a report last year that a married couple had a serious argument because the wife gave the husband’s Godzilla figurine away without consulting him.
However, the scriptwriters must not have picked up on the misogyny and discrimination that emerged in the reactions to the story.
There must be pop culture-savvy staff among the ministry’s content creators, given the content it posts on Facebook. The script probably was not discussed with the social media editors before filming began, leading to the public-relations disaster.
As for Ko, his campaign team should be well-versed in damage control given his penchant for off-the-cuff remarks.
Even though the office relented due to the fear of losing more support among young people, it did not offer a formal apology, but gave a reluctant “not their intention” justification.
It would be easier not to push the buttons of young people.
Chang Yueh-han is an adjunct assistant professor in Shih Hsin University’s Department of Journalism.
Translated by Rita Wang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS