As Taiwan grows wealthier as a nation with GDP per capita exceeding US$30,000 in recent years, its gap between rich and poor increases, while there have also been significant changes in household incomes and spending patterns since the COVID-19 pandemic emerged about three years ago.
Data released by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) in late August showed the average disposable income per household was NT$1.11 million (US$34,465) last year, 1.7 percent higher than the previous year, and NT$392,000 per person, up 3.8 percent annually.
DGBAS data showed that the average disposable income among the top 20 percent of households was NT$2.24 million last year, up 1.8 percent from 2021, while the average for the bottom 20 percent was NT$365,000, an annual increase of 1.8 percent, the agency’s 2022 Survey of Family Income and Expenditure showed. The agency attributed the increase in disposable income to the nation’s economic growth, with GDP expanding 2.35 percent last year from the previous year despite the impact of the pandemic.
Even so, the figure for the top 20 percent was 6.15 times higher than for the bottom 20 percent, the same as the previous year, but still the highest since 2011, when the number was 6.17. In other words, the wealth gap has not improved despite increases in people’s average disposable income and GDP.
The Gini coefficient — a measure of inequality where zero indicates complete equality of income and one indicates complete inequality — reached 0.354 last year, the highest since 1983, when it was 0.357. Unlike disposable income data that focuses on a comparison between the top and bottom 20 percent of households, the Gini coefficient summarizes inequality in terms of overall income distribution, and last year’s figure shows that income inequality in Taiwan has been more serious than expected in recent years.
Furthermore, the agency found that average household savings were NT$274,032 last year, the second-highest on record and lower only than NT$275,000 a year earlier, with families in the top income bracket continuing to accumulate wealth as their average savings rose to NT$869,559 from NT$864,115 in 2021, whereas those in the bottom bracket were still not able to make ends meet as the situation of negative savings remained unchanged for the 16th year in a row with a debt of NT$17,334 last year.
Former US president Barack Obama once said income inequality is the “defining challenge of our times,” while Pope Francis tweeted that “Inequality is the root of social evil.” Many experts believe income inequality inevitably leads to social instability and disorder, and even political turmoil.
In Taiwan, facing an increasing number of Chinese military movements in its air defense identification zone and territorial waters in recent years, a deteriorating income distribution would also affect citizens’ willingness to defend their country, according to an analysis by Wu Wen-chin (吳文欽), research fellow of the Institute of Political Science at Academia Sinica.
In an article published by the Journal of Asian and African Studies in April, Wu argues that perceived unfair income distribution reduces citizens’ attachment to their country and inhibits their willingness to fight. Wu’s analysis also found that perceived unfairness in wealth distribution reduces non-rich citizens’ willingness to fight for their country by dampening their national pride, a key element in psychological attachment to national identity.
Wu’s research highlights the importance of an equitable distribution of wealth and resources, and, more importantly, it suggests that unfairness in wealth distribution threatens national security. As Taiwan faces rising threats from its big neighbor China, policymakers should take heed of worsening wealth distribution, as the nation would be most vulnerable when neither the rich nor the poor are willing to stand up and fight for their country.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
RSS