There have been heated discussions online about retired navy captain Kuo Hsi’s (郭璽) allegations that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) shared classified information about Taiwan’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program with foreign entities.
Minister of Justice Tsai Ching-hsiang (蔡清祥) said an investigation has been launched. Certainly, these allegations deserve a serious, impartial and hopefully swift investigation.
However, many members of online defense communities are already jumping to conclusions based on Kuo’s allegations even though Ma has yet to be implicated.
This is partly due to the public’s mistrust of the KMT being able to handle defense matters. KMT politicians have been known to be unfairly critical of Taiwan’s efforts to shore up defense against a bellicose China.
For instance, Ma appeared on the political talk show Situation Room (少康戰情室), criticizing Taiwan’s Indigenous Defense Submarine project; the clip of her appearance was then shown on Chinese state media.
It is undeniable that the construction of Hai Kun-class submarines is an important milestone for Taiwan’s military-industrial complex. Itcan be expected to bring new capabilities to Taiwan’s navy and serve as an effective deterrent against Chinese aggression.
Although submarines are generally expensive investments, once all eight Hai Kun-class vessels are built, the fleet would certainly become a headache for Chinese military planners as it would add an extra dimension to maritime warfare.
Nonetheless, there are multiple components to the potential information leak that seem to paint a more complex, if not contradictory, picture.
Allegedly, after Kuo’s business negotiations with a South Korean submarine consultant had broken down, the consultant released a substantial amount of information about the Indigenous Defense Submarine project to several legislators, including Ma.
Recordings released by the KMT Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) allegedly indicate that Kuo wanted to be the intermediary between the South Korean submarine consultant and the navy, implying that Kuo had much to gain financially from the submarine’s construction.
Kuo said those recordings were edited out of context, and that the South Korean consultant released the recordings because he was bitter after being fired from the project.
It is becoming more difficult to separate defense policy from politics. This is particularly true when it comes to this investigation.
The KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party are seeking to capitalize on this investigation in light of the upcoming presidential election. Political pundits have discussed this case disproportionately on their talk shows, despite limited unbiased information. The escalation of discourse is unproductive.
With the conflicting business interests and political motivations involved in this investigation, the truth most likely lies somewhere between Kuo’s allegations and Ma’s counter-allegations. At this point, Kuo and Ma should be presumed innocent.
This scandal should not distractfrom the important role the Hai Kun-class submarines can be expected play in the defense of Taiwan’s waters.
It is premature to jump to any conclusions regarding the allegations without an official verdict. All the information released at this point paints a murky picture.
Linus Chiou is a part-time writer based in Kaohsiung.
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In the weeks following the 2024 US presidential election, I have received one question more than any other from friends in Taiwan — how will Donald J. Trump’s return to the White House affect Taiwan and cross-Strait relations? Some Taiwan counterparts have argued that Trump hates China, so therefore he will support Taiwan, according to the logic that the enemy of one’s enemy is a friend. Others have expressed anxiety that Trump will put pressure on Taiwan to dramatically increase defense spending, or to compensate the United States for allegedly “stealing” America’s semiconductor sector. While I understand these hopes and concerns, I
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS