The death of trailblazing US senator Dianne Feinstein presented her fellow Democrats with two key questions on Friday last week: Who will replace her in the chamber and who will take her seat on the committee that approves federal judges.
The answer to the first question has been made: California’s Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom named Laphonza Butler as her successor.
However, filling the 90-year-old lawmaker’s seat on the US Senate Judiciary Committee touches one of the most critical levers of partisan power in Washington and will require cooperation from Republicans.
The Democrats’ majority in the chamber has temporarily shrunk by one, to 50-49, following the death of Feinstein, who had been sidelined for a month earlier this year by a bout of shingles.
The vacancy did not pose an immediate problem for Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer in a standoff with US House of Representatives Republicans over a looming US government shutdown.
“Earlier this morning, we lost a giant in the Senate,” an emotional Schumer said on Friday last week.
Newsom, a rising star in the Democratic Party, said prior to naming Feinstein’s replacement: “There is simply nobody who possessed the poise, gravitas and fierceness of Dianne Feinstein.”
Feinstein in February said she would not seek re-election and contenders began lining up for her seat.
The California primary is on March 5 next year with a Dec. 8 filing deadline for prospective candidates. The last time a Republican won a Senate seat in the heavily Democratic state was in 1992.
Democrats and Republicans can run in the same primary, with the top two vote-getters, regardless of party affiliation, facing off in the general election.
Liberal US Representative Barbara Lee is running for the seat, as are other prominent Democrats, including US representatives Adam Schiff and Katie Porter.
Feinstein’s death leaves a 10-10 deadlock on the Judiciary Committee, which is in charge of reviewing presidential nominations to federal courts, including the US Supreme Court.
With the Republican-controlled House blocking most attempts at bipartisan legislation, the Democratic Senate has focused this year on approving Democratic US President Joe Biden’s judicial nominees. It has approved 143 since Biden took office in January 2021.
That is an attempt to balance the 234 appointments over four years by former US president Donald Trump, including three Supreme Court justices that cemented a 6-3 conservative majority.
Any move by Schumer to fill Feinstein’s seat on the panel with another Democrat would need Republican cooperation in a vote by the full Senate.
Earlier this year, Republicans blocked a request by Schumer to allow a temporary Democratic stand-in on the Judiciary Committee while Feinstein recuperated. Historically, the Senate has not stood in the way of filling committee vacancies caused by a member’s death.
Senate Republicans said on Friday last week that they do not intend to contest a move to replace Feinstein on the committee after her death.
However, they have broken precedent around judicial appointments before, most notably in 2016 when top Senate Republican Mitch McConnell refused a vote on former US president Barack Obama’s nominee to succeed conservative justice Antonin Scalia, saying it was inappropriate to do so in an election year.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS