The blue and white political camps have been trying hard to gain power and to achieve their goals, they have used every means to attack the ruling party, including unwarranted smears and low-quality fake news.
Only by punishing such behavior with the judicial system can turbulence as a result of political conflict be avoided.
The use of political smears and fake news to attack political opponents has a long history. With the advent of social media — which means false reports can be generated cheaply and spread easily — their influence has become even more considerable.
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), without any evidence, accused President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of profiteering from Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corp.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Wang Hung-wei (王鴻薇) accused J&V Energy Technology Co chairman Lai Chin-lin (賴勁麟), a former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator, of monopolizing Taiwan Power Co’s (Taipower) green energy projects.
KMT Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) spread rumors that imported eggs would cause cancer, causing panic.
Online commentator Lin Yu-hong (林裕紘), who is related to the Chang family — a political power in Yunlin County — and runs the “Lin Bay Hao You” (“Lin Bay 好油”) Facebook page, said that the imported eggs were mostly rotten because he had found that a few locally produced eggs had gone bad.
A KMT employee, Hsu Che-pin (許哲賓), was detained, accused of helping Lin fabricate death threats.
Disseminating smears on social media has become so serious that it has hindered the development of Taiwan’s industries.
Those who spread rumors do not have to pay a price. After Hsu Chiao-hsin’s rumor was debunked, she pretended nothing had happened and started another round. Unscrupulous politicians and faction leaders employed this strategy, which led to former Taipei Agricultural Products Marketing general manager Wu Yin-ning (吳音寧) and former minister of agriculture Chen Chi-chung (陳吉仲) losing their jobs.
Others can benefit by stockpiling goods, creating social panic and elevating prices to boost their profits.
If this chaos is to be stopped, wrongdoers must be punished and damages must be paid.
In the US judicial system, in addition to compensation, punitive damages are awarded by a court to punish defendants whose conduct is considered negligent or intentional. The purpose is to stop them from reusing the same tricks. The amount of the payment is usually considerable, hence it is an effective preventive measure.
When Lin fabricated a story that his family had received death threats, he was supported by former New Power Party (NPP) legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), former National Taiwan University president Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) and politicians from the blue and white camps. As the saying goes, “three men talking makes a tiger, and a rumor repeated enough becomes true.”
After they were found out, all they had to do was delete their social media posts and apologize. This has become standard operating procedure of the blue and white camps, and it can only be stopped by heavy penalties.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications showed how to do it when dealing with Taiwan’s “pedestrian hell.” Many drivers have changed their behavior after the maximum fine for failing to yield to pedestrians was increased to NT$6,000. The threat of heavy fines can be effective and they must be applied when necessary.
Robert Wang is a writer.
Translated by Emma Liu
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS