The blue and white political camps have been trying hard to gain power and to achieve their goals, they have used every means to attack the ruling party, including unwarranted smears and low-quality fake news.
Only by punishing such behavior with the judicial system can turbulence as a result of political conflict be avoided.
The use of political smears and fake news to attack political opponents has a long history. With the advent of social media — which means false reports can be generated cheaply and spread easily — their influence has become even more considerable.
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), without any evidence, accused President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of profiteering from Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corp.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Wang Hung-wei (王鴻薇) accused J&V Energy Technology Co chairman Lai Chin-lin (賴勁麟), a former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator, of monopolizing Taiwan Power Co’s (Taipower) green energy projects.
KMT Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) spread rumors that imported eggs would cause cancer, causing panic.
Online commentator Lin Yu-hong (林裕紘), who is related to the Chang family — a political power in Yunlin County — and runs the “Lin Bay Hao You” (“Lin Bay 好油”) Facebook page, said that the imported eggs were mostly rotten because he had found that a few locally produced eggs had gone bad.
A KMT employee, Hsu Che-pin (許哲賓), was detained, accused of helping Lin fabricate death threats.
Disseminating smears on social media has become so serious that it has hindered the development of Taiwan’s industries.
Those who spread rumors do not have to pay a price. After Hsu Chiao-hsin’s rumor was debunked, she pretended nothing had happened and started another round. Unscrupulous politicians and faction leaders employed this strategy, which led to former Taipei Agricultural Products Marketing general manager Wu Yin-ning (吳音寧) and former minister of agriculture Chen Chi-chung (陳吉仲) losing their jobs.
Others can benefit by stockpiling goods, creating social panic and elevating prices to boost their profits.
If this chaos is to be stopped, wrongdoers must be punished and damages must be paid.
In the US judicial system, in addition to compensation, punitive damages are awarded by a court to punish defendants whose conduct is considered negligent or intentional. The purpose is to stop them from reusing the same tricks. The amount of the payment is usually considerable, hence it is an effective preventive measure.
When Lin fabricated a story that his family had received death threats, he was supported by former New Power Party (NPP) legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), former National Taiwan University president Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) and politicians from the blue and white camps. As the saying goes, “three men talking makes a tiger, and a rumor repeated enough becomes true.”
After they were found out, all they had to do was delete their social media posts and apologize. This has become standard operating procedure of the blue and white camps, and it can only be stopped by heavy penalties.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications showed how to do it when dealing with Taiwan’s “pedestrian hell.” Many drivers have changed their behavior after the maximum fine for failing to yield to pedestrians was increased to NT$6,000. The threat of heavy fines can be effective and they must be applied when necessary.
Robert Wang is a writer.
Translated by Emma Liu
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS