Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrote on Facebook on Monday that he would not attend the Double Ten National Day celebration in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei on Tuesday next week, saying that he disagreed with the official English title for this year: “Taiwan National Day.”
Double Ten National Day would help achieve national unity and social harmony if every political party were to participate in the celebrations.
Moreover, with the People’s Republic of China attempting to sow division and discontent in Taiwan as part of its objective of annexing the nation, it is more vital than ever for the parties to work together.
Ma has declined to attend the celebration for personal and ideological reasons, but his absence will be harmful from a national perspective.
The situation is reminiscent of the Judgement of Solomon story from the Bible, in which a mother agrees to be parted with her child to avoid having the infant cut in half and divided between her and another woman who claimed the child as her own.
If Ma truly cared about the Republic of China, he would seize every opportunity to promote national unity in the face of a common enemy, rather than risk further division.
Compare Ma’s actions with those of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), whose attendance at the opening ceremony of the Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) Presidential Library in January last year was criticized by members of her own Democratic Progressive Party.
However, Tsai prioritized supporting Taiwan’s existence and offered an olive branch to those on the other side of the political divide.
Huang Wei-ping is a former think tank researcher.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS