It is refreshing to witness Taiwan strengthening its ties with African nations, both economically and culturally. Strategic undertakings like the Africa Project and the African Cultural Festival 2023 underscore these efforts.
However, while the initiative has seen many successes, some challenges and room for improvement persist.
President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) diplomatic forays into Africa, especially her visits to Eswatini, were pivotal in setting the tone and direction of the project. On her maiden trip in 2018 and her subsequent visit last month, she delved deep into the synergies that bind Taiwan and Eswatini. Emphasizing mutual benefits and the possibility of a long-standing partnership, Tsai envisioned a relationship that would not just last for years, but span centuries.
During her recent visit, she discussed Taiwan’s impactful contributions, notably in critical areas such as healthcare and agriculture in Eswatini. Furthermore, her commitment to empowering the next generation was evident with initiatives focusing on women and young people, most notably, the training of 5,000 women in business and financial management.
From a trade and economic vantage point, the results of the Africa Project are indeed commendable. The statistics narrate a compelling story: Trade volume between Taiwan and Africa witnessed a meteoric rise, from US$4.65 billion in 2018 to a staggering US$7.81 billion in subsequent years, growth of nearly 70 percent. Such figures not only illustrate the success of this blueprint, but also highlight Africa’s growing importance in Taiwan’s external trade strategy.
The African Cultural Festival 2023, spearheaded by Taiwan Medical University’s (TMU) Office of Global Engagement, was more than just an event; it was a testament to the power of cultural exchanges and the deepening ties between Taiwan and the African continent.
Spanning from May 1 to 12, the festival was an exuberant showcase of Africa’s rich mosaic of traditions, beliefs and art forms.
Beyond the vibrant performances and informative forums, the festival was a focal point of diplomatic camaraderie, with eminent dignitaries attending the occasion. The presence of His Excellency Promise Sithembiso Msibi Ambassador of Eswatini and His Excellency Mohamed Hagi, the Somaliland ambassador to Taiwan, was not just ceremonial. It underscored the deep-rooted ties and mutual admiration shared between Taiwan and its African allies.
Moreover, representatives from Nigeria, including the newly appointed trade commissioner, His Excellency Dipo Bamidele Adegoke, further amplified the festival’s diplomatic resonance.
However, the festival also faced criticism, which Taiwan should heed. The absence of Africans among the festival’s dancers at the opening ceremony was glaring. A co-organizer’s defense, stating they wanted a “professional group that dances without any mistake,” was problematic. Similarly, several Taiwanese business associations exclude Africans from their memberships.
This echoes concerns regarding China’s businesses in Africa, where Africans are seldom involved in ventures, management or labor. Given Africa’s history, marred by centuries of dehumanization and exploitation — from the slave trade to colonialism — and continued neocolonialism, Taiwan must be sensitive and avoid treading the same path.
Furthermore, as countries such as France are facing resistance in Africa for their perceived neocolonial attitudes, Taiwan must approach its partnerships with respect and genuine collaboration. Incorporating Africans in business, culture and dialogues is essential to foster trust and mutual respect.
The TMU Square’s festival celebrations were undeniably rich, with performances such as one by the Senbe Vocal Percussion Band captivating attendees. Still, true cultural exchange requires embracing diversity and ensuring representation. For Taiwan to create lasting relationships in Africa, it must focus on meaningful and inclusive interactions.
Taiwan’s Africa Project and the African Cultural Festival 2023 are commendable ventures that signal the nation’s intention to forge closer ties with Africa. While the achievements are noteworthy, a more inclusive and critical approach is essential.
Taiwan stands at a crucial juncture, and its decisions will determine whether its African ventures are seen as genuine partnerships or merely another form of neocolonialism.
Richard Atimniraye Nyelade is a sociology-anthropology lecturer at the University of Ottawa, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs fellow and a visiting academic at National Chengchi University.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS