The past year has seen frequent online reports about a resurgence of COVID-19. They might have sounded like the story of boy who cried wolf, but now there could really be a wolf on the prowl. Will packs of wolves appear this fall and winter, as happened in 2021 and last year? With alarm signals on the rise in Europe and North America, the best thing to do would be to be prepared.
With the Internet, information is easily spread. COVID-19 has been the center of attention for three years, so it is one of the top news items. Some of the information is true, some is false, and there is also some information that was true, but is now outdated.
Online reports might talk about how infections and hospitalizations are increasing, how the symptoms are different from before and how old tests are useless for new variants of the virus. The COVID-19 situation is continuously changing. No sooner does someone say that the situation is improving than the virus starts spreading again.
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Sept. 12 announced that, as of Sept. 2, COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations had increased each week for eight consecutive weeks. The Sept. 12 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association published an article titled “COVID-19 in the fall of 2023 — Forgotten but not gone.” On Monday last week, the US government resumed providing the public with free COVID-19 test kits.
The most concerning question for the public health and medical communities is whether the epidemic will grow more severe during the fall and winter, as outbreaks of infectious respiratory diseases usually start in the fall and peak around the end of winter and beginning of spring.
At this stage, nobody knows whether the early increase in COVID-19 cases this year means there will be a major outbreak this year. Many experts think it might not happen, because everyone has acquired some degree of immunity.
Although a person’s antibodies start to decline three to six months after they are first formed, the body’s immune system also has other weapons, such as T-cells and other kinds of immunological memory. The second or third time that a person’s body encounters a virus, it can create antibodies and mobilize immune cells much faster and more effectively than the first time.
Some experts believe that this year’s increase in the number of COVID-19 cases started in the summer because it was particularly hot, prompting people to stay indoors and with the air-conditioning switched on, crowded together as much as they would be in winter.
Will you be prepared if Taiwan is struck by a new wave of COVID-19? Does the nations have sufficient stocks of disease-prevention supplies and equipment? Has the government negotiated and signed contracts for the procurement of new vaccines?
Earlier this year, some political hacks first made a fuss about a shortage of eggs and then accused the government of importing expired eggs or colluding with profiteers. Those same politicians are likely to criticize the government again over any flaws in its epidemic preparedness.
However, whatever the government does, it must prioritize public health and not let its actions be disrupted for fear of criticism by malicious politicians. Individuals and communities should make their own preparations for an outbreak. It is much better to make preparations that are not needed than to be unprepared.
Taiwan has won many battles against the virus, but the war is not yet over. The nation must be prepared for every eventuality.
Hsieh Ann-ming is a retired physician.
Translated by Julian Clegg
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS