In March, Lu Chien-yi (盧倩儀), a research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, and other academics caused a stir by forming an “anti-war” group, which called for an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine; an end to “American militarism and economic sanctions” against Russia; and for Taiwan to maintain positive and “equidistant” relations with the US and China, and focus on social welfare and climate change mitigation, rather than on military and war spending.
A few days ago, Public Television Service’s (PTS) Theme Night Show (公視主題之夜Show) hosted a debate between Lu and author Wang Hao (汪浩) on war issues and cross-strait relations. Lu asked people to consider NATO’s expansion and the West’s role in causing the Ukraine war.
The last thing that a small nation next to a large nation, which is a bad actor, should do is provoke its neighbor, she said.
Wang said that if Ukraine had not bolstered its military prowess and prepared for war after Russia annexed Crimea eight years ago, it would have been annihilated within a week.
Wang said that Taiwan, for its situation, should boost its national defense and seek support from the global community.
Lu said that she is not an expert on the topic, but would ask that China “leave Taiwan alone,” a flimsy solution based on wishful thinking that seemed ludicrous for a top researcher to put forward on such a high-profile show.
What is more disconcerting is that she touted her “objectivity” by tapping into ideals such as that war has only losers and small nations piling up weapons for defense is usually seen as a provocation by the other side.
By pointing out flaws in the democratic process, she is speaking up for aggressors such as Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). For her, opposing the US and opposing democracy are two sides of the same coin, while democracies serve the interests of “certain groups” rather than benefiting everyone.
To people in Lu’s camp, the US is the leader in a bloc that foments unrest and war to benefit weapons manufacturers.
While Taiwan is a democratic society that protects freedom of speech, there must be limits on powerful media entities amplifying bad ideas. Taxpayer-funded PTS has a responsibility to ensure it has an unequivocal stance on national security and national identity.
Media firms seek eye-catching content to boost viewership, so PTS made the right business decision by inviting Lu on to the show, given the response it drew from the public.
However, as a public entity, it must stick to its mission of serving the public, not vying for attention.
The anti-war narrative was condemned and largely sidelined in March, which should have shown that it was a minority view, but PTS put it back in the limelight and turned an unequivocal issue into a debate. Allowing an anti-democratic narrative airtime was negligence of its social responsibility. It was not embracing diversity, but sought to bolster its viewership.
As a public organization, PTS should ensure that its content is for the public good and based on universal values, and not be a tool to undermine democracy.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS