A fire and subsequent explosions at Launch Technologies Co’s (明揚國際) golf ball factory at Pingtung Technology Industrial Park (屏東科技產業園區) on Friday killed at least nine people, prompting questions over how such a catastrophe could have occurred.
Despite how near Pingtung is to Kaohsiung, the industries of these two places are drastically different. Kaohsiung is an industrial hub, whereas Pingtung relies on agriculture.
Although Pingtung might be less polluted, it also has fewer job opportunities. The Pingtung County Government, with support from the central government, has arranged a series of measures to revitalize local industries, including the establishment of low polluting industrial parks with high technology and agriculture firms. Since the opening of the parks, the factories inside have been monitored in accordance to strict regulations. No corporation should cause safety problems or environmental damage.
Pingtung Technology Industrial Park is conveniently located near Kaoping Bridge (高屏大橋). The factories in the park are supposed to be low-polluting ones, as essentially any factory not listed on the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ “low-pollution industries list” can be defined as such.
Launch Technologies Co’s plant is not on the ministry’s list, as the materials it uses to manufacture golf balls are not hazardous. Nearby residents had never protested against the factory, nor was it difficult for the corporation to hire workers. It is indeed surprising that such a disaster could have happened.
While the cause of the fire is under investigation, initial findings suggest it was triggered by a leak of volatile chemicals. Some chemicals can be categorized as stable, but once exposed to vibrations or contact with light or elements such as water, a chemical reaction can result, which can be exothermic and even lead to an explosion.
When trying to extinguish a fire, the cause of the blaze must be understood to determine which method should be used, such as dry powder extinguishers or water.
In addition to chemical factors, attention should be given to physical ones. Nanoparticles can create such physical factors. In a confined space, if the concentration of some small particles reaches its maximum, a dust explosion can occur. A similar explosion once happened in a Japanese rice barn. Another example is the 2015 explosion and fire during a party at Formosa Fun Coast (八仙海岸) water park, which kill 15 people and injured nearly 500.
When using chemicals, all corporations should refer to material safety data sheets. The documents lay out each substance’s chemical and physical properties, and toxicity, as well as proper storage and management procedures. Factories should follow these guidelines, while local fire service agencies should also understand such information. Only in doing so can the correct measures be implemented when a catastrophe occurs.
Meanwhile, people should not rely on the authorities to revise the laws and unnecessarily regulate matters after each incident, as that can inconvenience industries. Corporations and factories should be able to manage themselves, and people in the industry typically know much more about the raw materials and substances they use than government officials. The companies should take the responsibility to educate and train their employees to understand the characteristics of the materials they use. After all, it is a corporation’s fundamental duty to protect the safety of its employees.
Chen Wen-ching works in environmental services.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS