Some amount of hyperbole is to be expected in national conversations, especially as an election draws near. As the most important poll in eight years starts to crest over the horizon, aggrievement and aggrandizement seem to have gone into overdrive — and about eggs, no less.
The issue began earlier this year, when an egg shortage sweeping the rest of the world caught up with Taiwan. The causes were manifold, as they often are, led by a global bird flu pandemic that devastated populations of egg-laying hens, cold weather affecting production, and material prices raising feed and energy costs for farmers. These factors pushed egg prices up from NT$23.5 (US$0.73) per 600g in 2021 to NT$45.5 in March, triggering scarcity fears that inevitably led to hoarding.
The government responded with a special import program, ultimately shipping 145 million eggs from Brazil and six other nations between March and July, and fixing prices slightly higher to stop them from inflating even further. It also earmarked NT$3.3 billion over three years to modernize the domestic egg industry and boost local production, with an eye on ensuring that the nation is never again affected by the vicissitudes of global production. Earlier this month, the Ministry of Agriculture said that Taiwan should be egg self-sufficient by November. Yet most people have not heard all this good news, as it has been buried by an avalanche of controversy.
Opposition politicians have called countless news conferences to lambast the government for a number of issues, including the destruction of 37 percent of the imports after they expired, improper labeling and the discovery of banned substance residues in eggs from Brazil. The criticisms included unsubstantiated accusations that expired eggs had been sold in supermarkets and that import contracts had been granted as political favors.
In response, the Food and Drug Administration and local governments have expanded inspections of egg processing factories, finding a few infractions, but nothing of substantive concern (despite what some politicians might say). Even the unfortunate destruction of expired imports is not unusual, as 37 percent is on par with the US Department of Agriculture’s estimated food waste of 30 to 40 percent.
Weeks of political furor culminated last week in the resignation of former minister of agriculture Chen Chi-chung (陳吉仲), pushing out an official who has served as either deputy head or head of agriculture in Taiwan since 2016.
Still, politicians remain reticent to drop the issue, seeing how politically useful it has been. Now that the public has been steeped in fears of food safety, demand for domestically produced eggs has skyrocketed amid distrust of imports. Due to this, egg prices are to rise again this week to NT$55 per 600g from NT$53 for retail consumers and to NT$45.5 from NT$43.5 at last production sites, according to the Taipei Egg Retailers’ Association, which also expects the egg shortage and price hikes to worsen throughout the rest of the year due in part to decreased consumption of imports.
Thanks to the circus manufactured by political opportunists, the egg woes of months past are making a comeback.
This is not to say that issues raised by politicians are invalid. Heavier scrutiny in the name of food safety and holding elected officials accountable is always welcome. Yet when controversy eclipses real issues, it distorts the truth even further, creating the kind of reactionary backsliding that leaves everyone worse off.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS