New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate, has vowed that if elected, he would return compulsory military service to four months, while his political party has a track record of blocking arms deals with the US.
In an English-language article titled “Taiwan’s path between extremes: the Kuomintang presidential candidate lays out a plan to avert war with China” published in Foreign Affairs magazine, Hou wrote: “When it comes to relations across the Taiwan Strait, I have always believed both in maintaining peace while increasing dialogue and in maintaining peace through strength ... Taiwan’s most important priority should be to strengthen its national defense and deter the use of force by mainland China. To do so, I aim to build a strong military, enhance cooperation with partners and allies and increase our deterrence capabilities to better safeguard Taiwan and the island groups of Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu.”
When Hou was visiting think tanks in the US, he said Taiwan needed to increase its military strength not only to ensure cross-strait stability and Taiwan’s security, but also to mitigate concerns held by the rest of the world regarding the Taiwan Strait. Hou said that Taiwan should maintain dialogue with China to lower the risk of conflict and increase mutual understanding, adding that Taipei did not hold unrealistic expectations of Beijing.
It would seem that Hou is being disingenuous: When facing the Taiwanese public, he wants to cut military spending and reduce compulsory military service, whereas in the presence of US think tanks, he vowed to bolster national defense. Does Hou not know he is playing a double part, in the same fashion as the bat in Aesop’s fable of the battle of birds and beasts?
Even though Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has made it clear that the “1992 consensus,” means China’s “one China principle, no different interpretations” or “one China, two systems,” Hou, in vowing to “resolve any crises through cross-strait dialogue,” is the one still mumbling about the “1992 consensus,” the “Republic of China” and opposition to “one country, two systems” behind China’s back. Perhaps Hou considers mumbling his way through to be “dialogue.”
So far, the three opposition presidential candidates, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), independent presidential candidate Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) and Hou, have all visited the US.
Hou, who campaigned hard to prohibit the import of US pork and pork products containing ractopamine, has recently traveled all the way to the US. Gou, who once remarked that “democracy doesn’t put food on the table,” has twice visited the leader of the Democratic Party in his US-Taiwan flag patch embroidered cap. Ko, who said that Taiwan should maintain “equidistant” relations with China and the US, might now make a second trip.
It is all the more ironic that all three candidates, who have condemned the US or democratic values in the past, have now unanimously avoided China like the plague. Hou, who has maintained that exchange is better than antagonism, seems not to harbor any plans to visit China and conduct “exchange” activities. Gou, who has heavily invested in China, seems to not show any interest in wearing a Taiwan-China flag patch embroidered cap and pay the autocratic country a visit. Ko, who has already graced the US and Japan with his presence, has not made a “homecoming” visit to the country that he considers “one family.” In the eyes of Beijing, does Ko’s behavior fit so-called “equidistant” relations or is it more akin to one family all shunning an unwelcome relative?
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor.
Translated by Rita Wang
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s