Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, and owner of social media platform X, has been slammed for his remark regarding cross-strait relations.
Musk recently said that “Their [Beijing’s] policy has been to reunite Taiwan with China. From their standpoint, maybe it is analogous to Hawaii or something like that, like an integral part of China that is arbitrarily not part of China.”
His ignorance about Asian history is apparent in this comment, which comes after his suggestion last year to make Taiwan a “special administrative zone” similar to Hong Kong.
The moment the Manchu Qing Dynasty ceded Taiwan to Japan as a result of the 1895 Treaty of Shimonoseki, Taiwan ended all legal and kinship ties with China. From other historical perspectives, the Constitution of the Republic of China promulgated in 1946 did not explicitly mention Taiwan or any other geographical area.
Since its founding in 1949, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had any control or sovereignty over Taiwan. As a result, Taiwan has always said that Taiwan and China are “one country on each side” and neither is subordinate to the other.
In 1894, Japan launched the First Sino-Japanese War. China was defeated and forced to sign the Treaty of Shimonoseki, stipulating that it cede Taiwan to Japan, thus putting an end to all connections between China and Taiwan.
As for the US and Hawaii, the US officially annexed Hawaii in 1898. Therefore, it is inappropriate for Musk to compare Taiwan’s relationship with China to Hawaii and the US, as the two historical events had completely different contexts and conditions.
Musk said that Taiwan is an “integral part of China that is arbitrarily not part of China.”
This is a clear lie. If the remark is allowed to stand, then remarks such as “Tesla is a non-US company, but is arbitrarily so” or “Space X is a subordinate organization under NASA, but is arbitrarily not so,” or “Social media platform X is a branch of Meta, but is arbitrarily not part of it” can also be said.
Minister of Foreign Affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) could not have put it better when he hit back on Musk’s X with the remark: “Listen up, Taiwan is not part of the PRC and is certainly not for sale.”
Perhaps Musk should be reminded of the biblical proverb that “Pride goes before destruction, and haughtiness before a fall.”
Hung Yu-jui is a Japanese-language teacher and translator.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS