Global tech giants are falling short on pledges to rein in and combat climate misinformation on their platforms, according to a new report calling for more political will to act on measures to curb the “spread of lies” that threaten climate action.
Climate Action Against Disinformation (CAAD), a coalition of more than 50 advocacy groups and businesses, released the report on Wednesday as activists and business leaders joined Climate Week NYC, an event held alongside the UN General Assembly each year, and leaders laid out green plans at the UN chief’s Climate Ambition Summit.
“Big Tech is clearly failing to stop the extensive climate misinformation that threatens climate action,” said Erika Seiber, climate disinformation spokesperson at Friends of the Earth, an environmental advocacy group.
Illustration: Louise Ting
The report examined the misinformation policies of Meta — the parent company of Facebook and Instagram — Pinterest, TikTok and Google-owned YouTube — and X, formerly known as Twitter.
The platforms were graded on a set of metrics that included policy content, enforcement, advertising, transparency and privacy.
Of the five platforms, Pinterest fared the best, with a score of 12 out of a possible 21, followed by TikTok with nine, Meta eight, YouTube six and X only scoring one.
Seiber said the scores in the report were “unacceptable” and should be a wake-up call for platforms and regulators to take climate misinformation seriously.
Common tactics in the proliferation of online climate-related misinformation include casting doubt on the reliability of green technology or positioning green energy as expensive and helping fuel the cost-of-living crisis.
The report said X lacks “any policy that addresses climate misinformation, any transparency mechanisms, and any proof of effective policy enforcement.”
A request for comment generated the standard autoreply from X: “Busy now, please check back later.”
In contrast, the report called Pinterest an “industry leader” and said the company clearly defined climate misinformation and incorporated it into its policies — while still saying there was a lack of independent research confirming enforcement of its climate-related policies.
A Pinterest spokesperson said the platform was proud of the “industry-leading policies” and added that the company would continue to work with third-party experts, including CAAD, as new trends emerge.
Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment. TikTok had not offered a comment on the report at the time of publication.
A spokesperson for YouTube said Google’s policy explicitly prohibited the monetization of content that denies the existence of climate change, “as well as ads that promote these claims.”
The policy, the spokesperson said, means that ads that deny the existence or causes of climate change are blocked — pushing back on the report’s conclusion that Google’s ad policy, “while preventing monetization of climate denial content, does not address climate denial via advertisements themselves.”
Watchdog groups have long been tracking the issue.
In June, the wildfire smoke wafting from Canada to locations as far away as New York prompted a surge in the number of posts using the term “climate scam,” according to the Center for Countering Digital Hate, a non-profit group.
Questionable narratives about the wildfires and smoke included claims that breathing in smoke is not harmful to health, climate change does not worsen wildfires and that wildfires are part of a planned “climate scam,” the group found.
Climate change is creating hotter, drier conditions that can lay the groundwork for small fires to escalate into out-of-control blazes, research has found.
One way to combat disinformation when it comes to climate is by being transparent and relying on facts and figures, said Humza Yousaf, First Minister of Scotland, an early donor of finance to help developing countries deal with worsening loss and damage from extreme weather and rising seas.
“You can’t hide countries ablaze, on fire because of record temperatures and wildfires. You can’t hide flooding because of excessive rainfall,” he said in an interview after an event at Climate Week NYC.
“So we have to make sure that’s being amplified,” he added, while saying not everyone will be persuadable.
“I’m not sure we waste too much time on the naysayers, because some people, frankly, we will never convince,” he said.
The Thomson Reuters Foundation is the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters.
The US Department of Defense recently released this year’s “Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” This annual report provides a comprehensive overview of China’s military capabilities, strategic objectives and evolving global ambitions. Taiwan features prominently in this year’s report, as capturing the nation remains central to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vision of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” a goal he has set for 2049. The report underscores Taiwan’s critical role in China’s long-term strategy, highlighting its significance as a geopolitical flashpoint and a key target in China’s quest to assert dominance
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
RSS