At the end of March, the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), along with a few securities and futures agencies, released the Corporate Governance 4.0: Sustainable Development Action Plan. In this document, gender equality is highlighted as one of the main criteria for companies in Taiwan.
The plan said that all listed and over-the-counter (OTC) companies would have to include at least one female board member. If a company fails to meet the standard, it would be barred from participating in an initial public offering (IPO) or stock launch. Clearly, officials have paid great attention to gender issues when outlining the corporate governance plan. Corporations and financial agencies have been discussing such a trend and ways of handling it.
Regarding the inclusion of women in corporate boards, officials of the Securities and Futures Bureau of the FSC stated that companies should increase their number of female board members. This is a standard in line with the international community. The board members would be more diversified and gender equality can be promoted. Therefore, having a female board member would become a prerequisite for an organization to launch an IPO.
Moreover, the corporate boards of all listed and OTC companies should have at least one female board member by next year.
As of now, 163 companies do not meet the standard and they are required to improve their status next year.
In response to this plan, some market participants believe that although the issue of gender equality is significant, a person’s ability should be emphasized more. The requirement to them is somewhat unreasonable and might cause inconvenience for some companies.
I would also like to shed light on a potential problem in this plan: the issue of aging. Many corporate leaders in Taiwan are in their 80s or 90s. Recent news reports have said that when one of the Far Eastern Group’s most important leaders, Chang Tsai-hsiung (張才雄), announced his retirement, he was almost 100 years old.
Despite his age, he is still a board member of a few listed and OTC companies. In Japan and South Korea, more than 30 percent of the people who are over 65 continue to work; in Taiwan, the number is only 6 percent.
As we are becoming an aging society. Those who are over 65 are likely to continue to work, as has happened in other countries. To cope with the situation, regulations regarding both aging and corporate governance should be revised as early as possible.
For instance, the statutory retirement age of 65 and the age for claiming pensions can both be raised. Official agencies can also come up with more incentives for the elderly to continue their careers.
In fact, the government should start considering providing more incentives now, so that corporate boards would treat their senior members with respect, and in turn, seniors can offer their valuable experience for their entire company.
The issue of aging would only become increasingly more serious in our society, and it must be addressed alongside the plan of corporate governance.
I would not say that my methods are the correct ones, but I would like to shed light on this issue, and here are my two cents for further discussion.
Cheng Ming-te is a professor in Taipei City University of Science and Technology’s department of business administration.
Translated by Emma Liu
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS