The immense wealth of Terry Gou (郭台銘), an independent presidential hopeful, lets him buy many things, but one cannot simply buy political acumen.
Negotiations between Gou and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have largely broken down due to Gou’s refusal to compromise. Seeing his presidential campaign as a betrayal, staunch supporters of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) are also unlikely to vote for him. Nonetheless, Gou is a gifted showman and continues to be the focus of the media spotlight. It is undeniable that he brings a fresh and unruly vitality to Taiwanese politics.
Gou has attempted to set himself apart from the two other opposition candidates through a variety of publicity stunts, including showing up in front of the press dressed in full military camouflage during this year’s Han Kuang military exercises.
“Taiwanese need peace, not war. That is the message I am sending,” Gou told reporters.
Many see this stunt as distasteful, since Gou is neither an active-duty officer, nor is he affiliated with the armed forces. Yet any publicity is good publicity for an independent candidate. Like former US president Donald Trump, Gou first grabs the headlines and then sells his message.
Gou has selected a female running mate to highlight female voices in politics and create a more equitable culture. Ironically, only days after announcing the actress Tammy Lai (賴佩霞) — whose only “political experience” is portraying a presidential candidate in a Netflix show — as his pick for vice president, Gou’s campaign spokesman said that Lai is a useful “chess piece” and would step down if the TPP and the KMT are willing to nominate the “strongest presidential ticket,” with Gou as the parties’ nominee.
After all that virtue signaling, Gou’s ideal running mate is still a man, either TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) or New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜). The satire practically writes itself.
It is all too easy to dismiss this campaign entirely. However, that Gou still has considerable support — the latest polls show about 10 percent of voters would vote for him — reveals that many are disgruntled with the current two-party system. When people feel that they are not represented by those in power, some might support charismatic newcomers who promise unrealistic and radical changes. Gou’s platform is anachronistic at times, particularly on Taiwan-China relations, but it is also forward-looking with its emphasis on using of technology to improve the lives of ordinary citizens. Gou truly believes that artificial intelligence can solve many of Taiwan’s problems. The appeal of this message lies in its simplicity. However, if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is not true.
Perhaps realizing that his campaign is in a precarious position, Gou has desperately signaled that he is willing to join forces with the TPP and the KMT on multiple occasions. To be taken seriously by either camp, Gou’s campaign must collect enough signatures to qualify for the upcoming election. The question is ultimately whether Gou can tap into his loosely organized grassroots supporters to collect at least 289,000 signatures in a relatively short time. His next moves would be predicated upon the outcome of this signature drive; this might be his endgame.
We have the sea goddess Matsu to thank for bringing us this political spectacle; Matsu apparently came to Gou in a dream years ago and encouraged him to seek office. If Gou chooses to run as an independent, more chaos would be wrought upon the already fractured pan-blue alliance. This is likely Gou’s last waltz in politics, and it sure is entertaining.
Linus Chiou graduated with distinction from the University of Virginia. He is currently serving in the Taiwanese armed forces.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then