The immense wealth of Terry Gou (郭台銘), an independent presidential hopeful, lets him buy many things, but one cannot simply buy political acumen.
Negotiations between Gou and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have largely broken down due to Gou’s refusal to compromise. Seeing his presidential campaign as a betrayal, staunch supporters of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) are also unlikely to vote for him. Nonetheless, Gou is a gifted showman and continues to be the focus of the media spotlight. It is undeniable that he brings a fresh and unruly vitality to Taiwanese politics.
Gou has attempted to set himself apart from the two other opposition candidates through a variety of publicity stunts, including showing up in front of the press dressed in full military camouflage during this year’s Han Kuang military exercises.
“Taiwanese need peace, not war. That is the message I am sending,” Gou told reporters.
Many see this stunt as distasteful, since Gou is neither an active-duty officer, nor is he affiliated with the armed forces. Yet any publicity is good publicity for an independent candidate. Like former US president Donald Trump, Gou first grabs the headlines and then sells his message.
Gou has selected a female running mate to highlight female voices in politics and create a more equitable culture. Ironically, only days after announcing the actress Tammy Lai (賴佩霞) — whose only “political experience” is portraying a presidential candidate in a Netflix show — as his pick for vice president, Gou’s campaign spokesman said that Lai is a useful “chess piece” and would step down if the TPP and the KMT are willing to nominate the “strongest presidential ticket,” with Gou as the parties’ nominee.
After all that virtue signaling, Gou’s ideal running mate is still a man, either TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) or New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜). The satire practically writes itself.
It is all too easy to dismiss this campaign entirely. However, that Gou still has considerable support — the latest polls show about 10 percent of voters would vote for him — reveals that many are disgruntled with the current two-party system. When people feel that they are not represented by those in power, some might support charismatic newcomers who promise unrealistic and radical changes. Gou’s platform is anachronistic at times, particularly on Taiwan-China relations, but it is also forward-looking with its emphasis on using of technology to improve the lives of ordinary citizens. Gou truly believes that artificial intelligence can solve many of Taiwan’s problems. The appeal of this message lies in its simplicity. However, if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is not true.
Perhaps realizing that his campaign is in a precarious position, Gou has desperately signaled that he is willing to join forces with the TPP and the KMT on multiple occasions. To be taken seriously by either camp, Gou’s campaign must collect enough signatures to qualify for the upcoming election. The question is ultimately whether Gou can tap into his loosely organized grassroots supporters to collect at least 289,000 signatures in a relatively short time. His next moves would be predicated upon the outcome of this signature drive; this might be his endgame.
We have the sea goddess Matsu to thank for bringing us this political spectacle; Matsu apparently came to Gou in a dream years ago and encouraged him to seek office. If Gou chooses to run as an independent, more chaos would be wrought upon the already fractured pan-blue alliance. This is likely Gou’s last waltz in politics, and it sure is entertaining.
Linus Chiou graduated with distinction from the University of Virginia. He is currently serving in the Taiwanese armed forces.
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is