Figuratively and literally, the US was once again talking to the world in its customary roles as host, leader and force for good — or at least champion against misery and evil. US President Joe Biden struck all the right notes in New York as he addressed the 193 nations gathered in the UN General Assembly. Yet, his appeals will be far from enough to hold the world together.
In some ways this session, the UN’s 78th, could and should have highlighted the US’ role as the only plausible ward — or “hegemon” — over whatever remains of the liberal international order built after World War II. The leaders of the other four permanent members of the UN Security Council — Russia, China, France and the UK — did not show up. Biden had the P-5 stage to himself.
The world must resist the brutal onslaught of one UN member, Russia, against another, Ukraine, Biden repeated, as he said at the same podium a year ago. After all, the Kremlin’s war of aggression violates national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and thus the foundational principles of the UN Charter adopted in San Francisco in 1945. As a sign of his resolve to keep backing Kyiv, Biden will also host Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in the White House this week.
Biden paid homage to the daunting problems shared by all of humanity, which the UN, as the planet’s main forum for international cooperation, is meant to solve. Those are the 17 “sustainable development goals” (SDG) — what a pity that existential threats have to get such bureaucratic labels. These targets range from slowing climate change to alleviating hunger, ending poverty, eliminating tuberculosis, educating girls and more.
In a nod to the many delegates from the “Global South” who are frustrated that countries in Africa, Asia and South America play such peripheral roles in the UN system, Biden even renewed his offer to reform its institutions. The UN Security Council should expand to look more like geopolitics in the 21st century rather than the middle of the 20th, he said. On he went, each assertion sounding eminently plausible and reasonable.
Yet his words, several of which he slurred or elided as is his oratorical wont, will not join those of Pericles, Lincoln, Churchill or other leaders at comparable historical junctures. Too noisy is the din of the world’s feuding and fighting for them to even be heard outside the chamber, too loud the hissing of the cynics.
The divisions start with Moscow’s genocidal invasion of Ukraine. It is precisely the sort of war of aggression that the UN, conceived during the joint struggle against the Nazis, was meant to prevent and punish. More than that, since the Kremlin is blocking grain exports from Ukraine, its invasion is also one reason why world hunger is increasing again, wrecking that particular SDG. Still, much of the world still refuses to line up behind Biden and the West against Moscow.
Humanity’s tragedy of the commons continues with those other SDGs. Adopted in 2015 and intended to be solved by 2030, those goals are instead receding into the distance. More rather than fewer people live in dire poverty today than before the COVID-19 pandemic. At the current rate of progress, men and women will be treated equally in 300 years. Global warming is also accelerating rather than slowing, with this year’s weather disasters just a hint of what is to come.
Moreover, US leadership as advertised by Biden looks ever less credible to much of the world. Few in the UN General Assembly could have failed to notice that Biden is facing possible impeachment, the prosecution of his son Hunter and vitriolic rants in the US media about his age. Nor has it escaped their attention that the US increasingly cannot get its fiscal house in order. Much of this is symptomatic of the US’s extreme polarization, which will only increase as Biden’s predecessor, Donald Trump, starts showing up in various courts to defend himself against the 91 criminal charges against him, mostly for trying to steal the 2020 election. Then, next year, those two men will probably face off again in the presidential election.
So it does not help that the US, the putative champion of free and open societies, is struggling to preserve its own democracy and civility. Nor is it reassuring that Trump or a Trumpist candidate might just return to the White House in 2025. In his own speeches to the General Assembly, Trump never failed to deride the “globalism” he feels the institution represents, and to praise nationalism.
These rifts within the US are one reason multilateralism is on the defensive and “minilateralism” is on the rise, in the form of smaller blocs that compete with one another. This weakness of multilateralism is hardly new, though, and it can still be overcome. Already in 1945 John Foster Dulles, one of the drafters of the UN Charter in San Francisco (who became US secretary of state a decade after), wrote that the UN’s “lack of political power is a semi-permanent fact,” because the participating nations designed it that way. However, Dulles said that it behooved the world to keep striving for cooperation, and for the US to use its own power to help that effort along.
Biden is of that same mind. Yet he is also a long-in-the-tooth leader of a long-in-the-tooth hegemon keeping watch over a long-in-the-tooth post-war order.
Addressing the General Assembly, he repeated one phrase for effect: “We know our future is bound to yours.” In context, that was not as uplifting as intended.
Andreas Kluth is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering US diplomacy, national security and geopolitics. A former editor in chief of Handelsblatt Global and a writer for The Economist, he is author of Hannibal and Me. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS