The latest TikTok fad seems to involve combining “girl” with a host of other words to communicate a concept or movement. There is #GirlMath aka the justifications women use to spend on non-essentials. There is #GirlDinner, which is dinner for one that looks like a chaotic plate of what you want or leftovers or essentially riffing on a charcuterie board. Then we have the recent #GirlHammer trend in which TikTokers complete a handyman task without the use of a hammer, such as using a rolling pin to bang a nail into a wall. Some of these trends are silly. Some are helpful, but the one facing the most backlash is the #LazyGirlJob. It is a term that has united elder millennials, Gen X and boomers against Gen Z, because what does an early twenty-something know about burnout and struggling with work-life balance?
Honestly, maybe we should take a cue from Gen Z on this one.
A lazy girl job focuses on the holy trinity of fair pay, only working within your defined hours and flexibility such as remote work. There is an air of irreverence with the term lazy in this context. People are still doing their jobs, but they are aiming to find jobs that fit into their overall lifestyle design. That means more than just fixating on a career and achieving that elusive balance of being able to leave work at work and not be pinged by your manager at 8:30pm or get an urgent call while on vacation. As a woman who started my career during the era of #GirlBoss and #HustleHarder, this is a refreshing change of pace and probably much better for our collective mental health.
Illustration: Mountain People
Of course, the word lazy makes it sound like the aim is to find a job with no career trajectory. You are clocking in, doing what is required, and clocking out to go live your best life. This is certainly how some people are interpreting the trend, which nestles nicely under last year’s viral #QuietQuitting. A lazy girl job is not the same as quiet quitting. The latter is about putting in the bare minimum to not get fired or even withholding your abilities on the job. A lazy girl job is not about minimum effort, but about boundaries.
Frankly, I see this as an excellent idea with a branding problem. The difficulty with branding a concept is that you want it to be catchy and memorable, but going for irreverence can obscure the actual meaning of a movement. This is from a woman who created a financial literacy brand called Broke Millennial.
There are moments when it seems as though Gen Z has become jaded far too young. Gen X were known as cynics too, but Gen Z has had more access to information than the two generations prior. Gen X and millennials were sold and bought into similar dreams about achieving a comfortable life if you just get a college degree and work hard. Perhaps Gen Z saw that millennials hustled and still could not get a toehold to build a stable life. Even after following the rules, they were barely able to keep from drowning in financial obligations.
Some millennials and younger Gen Xers responded to a rigged game by joining the Financial Independence Retire Early, or FIRE, movement. That meant working even harder and living frugally to amass the wealth needed to opt out. Gen Z decided to be more chill. Part of me believes that being the first generation truly raised in the digital era and on the Internet, they are simply doing what youth Internet culture does best: trolling.
The lazy girl job jabs at the heart of capitalism, pushing back against deeply entrenched beliefs about work and career. It is about setting boundaries around time and prioritizing mental health. It is only working the hours for which a person is fairly compensated. It is opting out of mind-numbing, senseless meetings. It is demanding companies evolve to the reality of today by offering more flexibility because a lot of jobs do not need people physically in an office five days a week. The lazy girl job is Gen Z’s answer to FIRE, but it just feels less ambitious.
One significant criticism is that the lazy girl job is only available to some. There are careers that simply cannot — or currently do not — offer a healthy work-life balance. This is true for professions like doctors or lawyers and many working-class jobs. Tip workers certainly do not have the luxury of living that lazy-girl-job life. To add insult to injury, the generation likely to tip the worst are the lazy girls themselves — Gen Z. Only 35 percent tip at sit-down restaurants, according to a BankRate survey.
Another criticism is that seeming lack of ambition. No matter which generation you spring from, you would spend a significant percentage of your life working. Depending on your hours, you would probably spend almost 10 years in meetings, answering e-mails and sitting at your desk. It is good to have challenges and not become too mired in routine.
Yes, I am a millennial who largely supports this particular Gen Z trend, but here is a little unsolicited advice: It is shockingly easy to stop learning and growing as you age. Gen Z should be careful to not tap out too soon.
Erin Lowry is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering personal finance. She is the author of the three-part Broke Millennial series. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading