The latest TikTok fad seems to involve combining “girl” with a host of other words to communicate a concept or movement. There is #GirlMath aka the justifications women use to spend on non-essentials. There is #GirlDinner, which is dinner for one that looks like a chaotic plate of what you want or leftovers or essentially riffing on a charcuterie board. Then we have the recent #GirlHammer trend in which TikTokers complete a handyman task without the use of a hammer, such as using a rolling pin to bang a nail into a wall. Some of these trends are silly. Some are helpful, but the one facing the most backlash is the #LazyGirlJob. It is a term that has united elder millennials, Gen X and boomers against Gen Z, because what does an early twenty-something know about burnout and struggling with work-life balance?
Honestly, maybe we should take a cue from Gen Z on this one.
A lazy girl job focuses on the holy trinity of fair pay, only working within your defined hours and flexibility such as remote work. There is an air of irreverence with the term lazy in this context. People are still doing their jobs, but they are aiming to find jobs that fit into their overall lifestyle design. That means more than just fixating on a career and achieving that elusive balance of being able to leave work at work and not be pinged by your manager at 8:30pm or get an urgent call while on vacation. As a woman who started my career during the era of #GirlBoss and #HustleHarder, this is a refreshing change of pace and probably much better for our collective mental health.
Illustration: Mountain People
Of course, the word lazy makes it sound like the aim is to find a job with no career trajectory. You are clocking in, doing what is required, and clocking out to go live your best life. This is certainly how some people are interpreting the trend, which nestles nicely under last year’s viral #QuietQuitting. A lazy girl job is not the same as quiet quitting. The latter is about putting in the bare minimum to not get fired or even withholding your abilities on the job. A lazy girl job is not about minimum effort, but about boundaries.
Frankly, I see this as an excellent idea with a branding problem. The difficulty with branding a concept is that you want it to be catchy and memorable, but going for irreverence can obscure the actual meaning of a movement. This is from a woman who created a financial literacy brand called Broke Millennial.
There are moments when it seems as though Gen Z has become jaded far too young. Gen X were known as cynics too, but Gen Z has had more access to information than the two generations prior. Gen X and millennials were sold and bought into similar dreams about achieving a comfortable life if you just get a college degree and work hard. Perhaps Gen Z saw that millennials hustled and still could not get a toehold to build a stable life. Even after following the rules, they were barely able to keep from drowning in financial obligations.
Some millennials and younger Gen Xers responded to a rigged game by joining the Financial Independence Retire Early, or FIRE, movement. That meant working even harder and living frugally to amass the wealth needed to opt out. Gen Z decided to be more chill. Part of me believes that being the first generation truly raised in the digital era and on the Internet, they are simply doing what youth Internet culture does best: trolling.
The lazy girl job jabs at the heart of capitalism, pushing back against deeply entrenched beliefs about work and career. It is about setting boundaries around time and prioritizing mental health. It is only working the hours for which a person is fairly compensated. It is opting out of mind-numbing, senseless meetings. It is demanding companies evolve to the reality of today by offering more flexibility because a lot of jobs do not need people physically in an office five days a week. The lazy girl job is Gen Z’s answer to FIRE, but it just feels less ambitious.
One significant criticism is that the lazy girl job is only available to some. There are careers that simply cannot — or currently do not — offer a healthy work-life balance. This is true for professions like doctors or lawyers and many working-class jobs. Tip workers certainly do not have the luxury of living that lazy-girl-job life. To add insult to injury, the generation likely to tip the worst are the lazy girls themselves — Gen Z. Only 35 percent tip at sit-down restaurants, according to a BankRate survey.
Another criticism is that seeming lack of ambition. No matter which generation you spring from, you would spend a significant percentage of your life working. Depending on your hours, you would probably spend almost 10 years in meetings, answering e-mails and sitting at your desk. It is good to have challenges and not become too mired in routine.
Yes, I am a millennial who largely supports this particular Gen Z trend, but here is a little unsolicited advice: It is shockingly easy to stop learning and growing as you age. Gen Z should be careful to not tap out too soon.
Erin Lowry is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering personal finance. She is the author of the three-part Broke Millennial series. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS