The latest TikTok fad seems to involve combining “girl” with a host of other words to communicate a concept or movement. There is #GirlMath aka the justifications women use to spend on non-essentials. There is #GirlDinner, which is dinner for one that looks like a chaotic plate of what you want or leftovers or essentially riffing on a charcuterie board. Then we have the recent #GirlHammer trend in which TikTokers complete a handyman task without the use of a hammer, such as using a rolling pin to bang a nail into a wall. Some of these trends are silly. Some are helpful, but the one facing the most backlash is the #LazyGirlJob. It is a term that has united elder millennials, Gen X and boomers against Gen Z, because what does an early twenty-something know about burnout and struggling with work-life balance?
Honestly, maybe we should take a cue from Gen Z on this one.
A lazy girl job focuses on the holy trinity of fair pay, only working within your defined hours and flexibility such as remote work. There is an air of irreverence with the term lazy in this context. People are still doing their jobs, but they are aiming to find jobs that fit into their overall lifestyle design. That means more than just fixating on a career and achieving that elusive balance of being able to leave work at work and not be pinged by your manager at 8:30pm or get an urgent call while on vacation. As a woman who started my career during the era of #GirlBoss and #HustleHarder, this is a refreshing change of pace and probably much better for our collective mental health.
Illustration: Mountain People
Of course, the word lazy makes it sound like the aim is to find a job with no career trajectory. You are clocking in, doing what is required, and clocking out to go live your best life. This is certainly how some people are interpreting the trend, which nestles nicely under last year’s viral #QuietQuitting. A lazy girl job is not the same as quiet quitting. The latter is about putting in the bare minimum to not get fired or even withholding your abilities on the job. A lazy girl job is not about minimum effort, but about boundaries.
Frankly, I see this as an excellent idea with a branding problem. The difficulty with branding a concept is that you want it to be catchy and memorable, but going for irreverence can obscure the actual meaning of a movement. This is from a woman who created a financial literacy brand called Broke Millennial.
There are moments when it seems as though Gen Z has become jaded far too young. Gen X were known as cynics too, but Gen Z has had more access to information than the two generations prior. Gen X and millennials were sold and bought into similar dreams about achieving a comfortable life if you just get a college degree and work hard. Perhaps Gen Z saw that millennials hustled and still could not get a toehold to build a stable life. Even after following the rules, they were barely able to keep from drowning in financial obligations.
Some millennials and younger Gen Xers responded to a rigged game by joining the Financial Independence Retire Early, or FIRE, movement. That meant working even harder and living frugally to amass the wealth needed to opt out. Gen Z decided to be more chill. Part of me believes that being the first generation truly raised in the digital era and on the Internet, they are simply doing what youth Internet culture does best: trolling.
The lazy girl job jabs at the heart of capitalism, pushing back against deeply entrenched beliefs about work and career. It is about setting boundaries around time and prioritizing mental health. It is only working the hours for which a person is fairly compensated. It is opting out of mind-numbing, senseless meetings. It is demanding companies evolve to the reality of today by offering more flexibility because a lot of jobs do not need people physically in an office five days a week. The lazy girl job is Gen Z’s answer to FIRE, but it just feels less ambitious.
One significant criticism is that the lazy girl job is only available to some. There are careers that simply cannot — or currently do not — offer a healthy work-life balance. This is true for professions like doctors or lawyers and many working-class jobs. Tip workers certainly do not have the luxury of living that lazy-girl-job life. To add insult to injury, the generation likely to tip the worst are the lazy girls themselves — Gen Z. Only 35 percent tip at sit-down restaurants, according to a BankRate survey.
Another criticism is that seeming lack of ambition. No matter which generation you spring from, you would spend a significant percentage of your life working. Depending on your hours, you would probably spend almost 10 years in meetings, answering e-mails and sitting at your desk. It is good to have challenges and not become too mired in routine.
Yes, I am a millennial who largely supports this particular Gen Z trend, but here is a little unsolicited advice: It is shockingly easy to stop learning and growing as you age. Gen Z should be careful to not tap out too soon.
Erin Lowry is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering personal finance. She is the author of the three-part Broke Millennial series. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS