A survey by the Professor Huang Kun-huei Education Foundation showed that about 60 percent of people believe that high schools should not be based on gender division.
However, high schools separate students into two groups according to their gender.
Male and female students have to attend different schools.
That is not in line with the spirit of encouraging and helping students to adjust to actual society in which men and women interact with one another every day.
Moreover, such a separation of students based on gender division originated from the Japanese colonization of Taiwan.
Clearly, the arrangement has become outdated.
My friend and his sister were both excellent students in junior-high school.
After they graduated, my friend’s sister spent 3 minutes walking to a top-ranking girls’ high school, but my friend, a male student, had to ride his bicycle to another top-ranking boys’ high school.
Everyday, he had to spend much more time biking to school, no matter how terrible the weather was.
GOVERNMENT POLICY
He and his sister could have attended the same top-ranking school, but due to the policy of separating students based on their gender, they ended up in different ones.
Also, the current arrangement goes against the government’s policy to encourage students to attend a high school in their community so that they can save time and money that would otherwise be spent on commuting.
Defining a high school based on gender limits students’ options.
Not only is it unfair to students, schools are under great recruitment pressure.
Take Jingmei Girls’ High School — one of the top three high schools in Taipei — due to its inconvenient location and the exclusion of male students, the school has had to lower the bar of admission.
This is not good for the school’s development, nor is it favorable for the school to build an environment of diversity.
It is indeed regrettable if the school continues to be confined by its own traditional thinking.
SEXUAL ORIENTATION
High-school years are crucial for students to understand their gender identity and sexual orientation.
It is only natural that they are curious about sex.
A high school campus should be the same as society, in which different genders and identities coexist in harmony.
That would make high schools a much healthier, better environment for students.
Top-ranking schools that cultivate excellent students, in particular, must recognize that the gender-based separation of students is not so different from apartheid.
Those high schools create walls that prevent students from knowing more about gender and sex; consequently, students can only get to know those of different gender identities and sexual orientations in cram schools.
Meaningful traditions should be preserved, but outdated ones should be abolished as soon as possible.
Male and female students should study together and respect each other in schools.
Let us get rid of the separation of students based on their gender.
High schools should no longer be branded as either a girls’ school or boys’ school.
In this way, high schools would truly help students prepare for college.
Hsiao Chia-hung is an adjunct lecturer at university.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS