A survey by the Professor Huang Kun-huei Education Foundation showed that about 60 percent of people believe that high schools should not be based on gender division.
However, high schools separate students into two groups according to their gender.
Male and female students have to attend different schools.
That is not in line with the spirit of encouraging and helping students to adjust to actual society in which men and women interact with one another every day.
Moreover, such a separation of students based on gender division originated from the Japanese colonization of Taiwan.
Clearly, the arrangement has become outdated.
My friend and his sister were both excellent students in junior-high school.
After they graduated, my friend’s sister spent 3 minutes walking to a top-ranking girls’ high school, but my friend, a male student, had to ride his bicycle to another top-ranking boys’ high school.
Everyday, he had to spend much more time biking to school, no matter how terrible the weather was.
GOVERNMENT POLICY
He and his sister could have attended the same top-ranking school, but due to the policy of separating students based on their gender, they ended up in different ones.
Also, the current arrangement goes against the government’s policy to encourage students to attend a high school in their community so that they can save time and money that would otherwise be spent on commuting.
Defining a high school based on gender limits students’ options.
Not only is it unfair to students, schools are under great recruitment pressure.
Take Jingmei Girls’ High School — one of the top three high schools in Taipei — due to its inconvenient location and the exclusion of male students, the school has had to lower the bar of admission.
This is not good for the school’s development, nor is it favorable for the school to build an environment of diversity.
It is indeed regrettable if the school continues to be confined by its own traditional thinking.
SEXUAL ORIENTATION
High-school years are crucial for students to understand their gender identity and sexual orientation.
It is only natural that they are curious about sex.
A high school campus should be the same as society, in which different genders and identities coexist in harmony.
That would make high schools a much healthier, better environment for students.
Top-ranking schools that cultivate excellent students, in particular, must recognize that the gender-based separation of students is not so different from apartheid.
Those high schools create walls that prevent students from knowing more about gender and sex; consequently, students can only get to know those of different gender identities and sexual orientations in cram schools.
Meaningful traditions should be preserved, but outdated ones should be abolished as soon as possible.
Male and female students should study together and respect each other in schools.
Let us get rid of the separation of students based on their gender.
High schools should no longer be branded as either a girls’ school or boys’ school.
In this way, high schools would truly help students prepare for college.
Hsiao Chia-hung is an adjunct lecturer at university.
Translated by Emma Liu
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS