Human civilization is fairly short-lived and having undergone several wars, humans have only just begun to understand that democracy is a more acceptable social system.
Taiwanese voted for a reliable and trustworthy government so that they do not have to worry about food safety, security or the quality of healthcare, and least of all eggs.
Even if there were no eggs on the shelves for a few days, people would not panic, because they know they are living in a free society, and that eggs would be back on the shelves as soon as the government responds to the shortage. After all, eggs are not everyday essentials and any food that contains amino acids can be an alternative.
However, Taiwan has been plagued by egg-related controversies since the beginning of this year.
It all started with a legislator questioning the government’s egg import program, then snowballed into a nationwide furor of people having qualms about eggs, with some even calling for Minister of Agriculture Chen Chi-chung (陳吉仲) to resign from his post. In response to the controversy, the government has offered many explanations to reassure people.
Nevertheless, anyone who searches for “eggs” on the Internet would see a series of misleading news reports. For two months certain media outlets have been issuing reports lambasting the Ministry of Agriculture for several things, such as how the government was “overfunding” egg import companies and the dangers of expired imported eggs, while giving a slap on the wrist to hoarders who caused shortage in the first place.
This kind of overwhelming and biased reporting aims to destroy consumers’ trust in the government’s agricultural policies. The same playbook can be seen in last year’s local elections, when there were waves of attacks on plagiarism and academic credentials or the government’s strategy to curb the COVID-19 pandemic.
The high volume of one-sided news reporting aims to brainwash the public by sowing mistrust, and creating social division through coercive persuasion and cognitive manipulation. I believe Taiwanese, with their educated background and sophisticated grasp of common knowledge, have the media literacy to tell the true from the false, and not fall for these ideological fallacies.
Chen Chiao-chicy is a psychiatrist at Mackay Memorial Hospital in Taipei and an adjunct professor.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS