A study published by US-based think tank RAND Corp on Thursday last week found that China is developing ways of using artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT to influence public perceptions of Taiwan via social media. Beijing is seeking to influence public opinion on both a domestic and international scale, which social media platforms are not well-equipped to defend against, the study said, adding that AI could improve the believability of China-produced content, while reducing costs.
A RAND study in 2021 found that China was “treating Taiwan as a test bed for developing attack vectors using disinformation on social media,” showing that Beijing’s use of AI is just the latest development in a long-term strategy. The study suggested that it would likely adapt its disinformation campaign against US targets in a conflict or crisis, and that those targets would likely include Chinese-American military officers and personnel and their families. This shows that while Taiwan faces an immediate threat from Chinese disinformation campaigns — particularly in the run-up to the presidential election in January — the US and other nations friendly to Taiwan are also vulnerable, and should work closely with Taiwan to tackle the issue.
The Taiwan AI Center of Excellence, which is focused on boosting the nation’s AI capabilities, opened in March and is expected to produce tangible results in the development of a Taiwan-made chatbot similar to ChatGPT by the year’s end, National Science and Technology Council Minister Wu Tsung-tsong (吳政忠) said. AI can have profitable applications in targeted advertising and automatic content creation and editing, which would serve as motivation for industry investment. Yet AI can also have national security applications, such as identifying vulnerabilities in computer systems and flagging malicious content.
China heavily polices domestic social media usage by banning most platforms, forcing citizens to rely on platforms such as WeChat, which is monitored and censored by China’s government. China takes advantage of Taiwan’s free access to information to spread disinformation on platforms such as Line and the Professional Technology Temple, Taiwan’s largest online bulletin board system. An article posted on the US government-affiliated Army University Press Web site listed disinformation on those platforms in recent years, including claims that China rescued stranded Taiwanese tourists in Japan during Typhoon Jebi in September 2018, or that Taiwan’s government lied about the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths in Taiwan.
The US government has since 2016 cooperated with Taiwan in combating disinformation through the US Congress-established Global Engagement Center, it said. Washington could do more by supporting relationships between US-based social media companies and the Taiwanese government and civic groups, and pursuing AI codevelopment, it suggested.
Taiwan should do what it can to facilitate such cooperative engagements with the US, given the shared interest in countering Chinese propaganda. AI could be an effective tool in countering China’s AI use. AI is scalable, self-learning, allowing for logarithmic advancements in its capabilities, and resource-efficient. Through social media platform cooperation, AI could be deployed to flag potentially problematic posts, and automatically remove posts from known offenders. It could also be used proactively to inject accurate information into ad space.
The Ministry of National Defense’s Information, Communications and Electronic Force Command could put more emphasis on Internet communications and take the fight to China, spreading information about Beijing’s human rights violations and encouraging dissent. It could enlist the help of AI to search for ways to compromise China’s critical and military infrastructure, which would be strategically crucial in the event of a conflict.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS