Heavy downpours on Sunday evening brought flooding and landslides to more than half of Chiayi County, blocking many key roadways. Areas including Jhongpu (中埔), Singang (新港), Minsyong (民雄), Jhuci (竹崎) and Fanlu (番路) townships had more than 200mm of rain on Sunday evening. Firefighters rescued 32 people near the Jhonghe Exchange along Provincial Highway No. 82 in Shueishang Township (水上).
However, damage and several deaths have led the public to accuse the government of failing to issue an advance warning. In the face of the public’s grievances, the government probably feels that its hands were tied, as mudslides are difficult to predict, even with the most modern technology.
This does not mean that landslides are beyond human control. The Landslide Susceptibility Index (LSI) was adopted to map and evaluate landslide susceptibility and to classify areas into five susceptibility zones: “very low,” “low,” “moderate,” “high” and “very high.” As mudslides are caused by a combination of factors, such as soil properties, geology, and soil and water conservation, prediction is a great challenge. The recent unexpected landslide in Jhuci is one such example. On Aug. 4, Nantou County’s Renai Township (仁愛) also experienced a major mudslide.
Nevertheless, prediction is still possible, as precipitation monitoring provides a certain degree of reliability. Hourly, daily and accumulated precipitation data are an important index for landslides. Once precipitation reaches a certain level in mountainous regions, the government should launch evacuation operations as a precaution. To better predict landslides, the following three factors could play a decisive role in the accuracy of predictions:
The first is widespread public awareness and education. Landslide incidents have shown that people’s disaster awareness, sensitivity and preparedness play a huge role in reducing loss of life, personal injury and damage from natural disasters. Precipitation monitoring provides officials and the public with the easiest index for predicting landslides and floods. The Agency of Rural Development and Soil and Water Conservation provides landslide-prone areas with rain gauges so that communities can monitor rainfall and take corresponding action.
Second, education and training are crucial in landslide predictions. While reading weather and precipitation data require professional training, the public should be taught basic knowledge and skills on the subject. This education should be coupled with the government’s disaster-resistant community policy promotion so that the public and community can have systematic learning and a higher awareness of disaster prevention and reduction.
Third, communities should form stronger ties with authorities. As the authorities are responsible for issuing warnings in landslide-prone areas, when the public has close connections with the authorities, they can ask for help to read the data and increase prediction accuracy.
According to my experience, the more proactive the community is, the more help they can get from the authorities in the event of disasters.
Even though landslides are difficult to predict, there are still some clues to follow for preliminary assessments, but these have to be built upon after the implementation of the three aforementioned factors.
Yang Yung-nane is a political science professor at National Cheng Kung University and a member of the board of directors of Transparency International Chinese Taipei.
Translated by Rita Wang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS