Bloomberg News seems to have drunk China’s Kool-aid regarding the Democratic Progressive Party’s presidential candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德). Its interview with Lai had the somewhat misleading headline of “He wants to lead Taiwan, but can he keep the peace?” This headline exemplifies the media holding unreasonable skepticism of Lai for his firm and widely known stance on Taiwan’s status.
On nearly every occasion with an international media presence, Lai would certainly be asked how he plans to lead Taiwan under increasing Chinese aggression. It is no secret that he views Taiwan as an already-independent country; that the Republic of China (Taiwan) and the People’s Republic of China (China) are not subordinate to each other. Hence, Taiwan’s declaration of independence is unnecessary.
Taiwan’s inclusive democratic election system is a prime example of its sovereignty, yet most media platforms ignore this.
The headline Bloomberg used for Lai’s interview — questioning whether he can maintain peace in the Taiwan Strait — is a fallacy in favor of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) agenda: Irritating China means breaking the peace.
Bloomberg and other international media should acknowledge that none of Taiwan’s presidential candidates nor Taiwanese will ever be the ones initiating such a war. It should be cherished, when people preserve their homeland, especially in the 21st-century free world where self-identity is a crucial element of human composition. The democratic values we have gained from history urge us to believe in democracy and fight authoritarianism, yet the way the media portray leaders like Lai seems to counter that.
Skepticsm of maintaining Taiwan’s democracy is not a value news outlets with democratic beliefs should possess. Taiwanese want to continue living in a free and democratic society; they surely want to avoid war more than anyone else. Bloomberg’s headline would unjustifiably drive down Taiwanese confidence in Lai, which could imperil Taiwan.
We do not teach our children to make peace with bullies, as that means tolerating abuse. We teach them to defend themselves — that is not the same as troublemaking. The same idea applies to China’s aggression toward Taiwan — that Taiwan is not a troublemaker for marching on its own unique path.
When the media adopt bias due to CCP propaganda, peace-lovers will unfortunately be perceived incorrectly; their love of democracy will be devalued. International media have a responsibility to publish impartial pieces that do not favor China’s agenda, and more importantly, do not discredit Taiwan for being a bellwether of global democracy.
Constantly prodding into what Taiwan’s next phase will be is impractical, as Taiwan should remain as it is. Taiwanese should not give up freedom for peace.
Instead of asking if Lai could maintain peace for Taiwan, it is more accurate to ask “how does he plan to peacefully maintain Taiwan.” Taiwan is a prosperous nation, and the president elected next January has a responsibility to preserve that. The international community should recognize that the CCP is the aggressor. Taiwan should not be blamed if China starts a war due to its irritation with what Taiwan stands for: a leading free democracy and global contributor.
Taiwan is at the forefront of defending universal democratic values that many countries, including the US, have been promoting. Taiwan should not be blamed or projected as an irresponsible actor of the international community merely for defending itself. Global media need to hold themselves accountable as they not only have influence on individual readers, but also have the power to influence the course of international conflict.
Albert Wang is a student at the University of Washington. He previously worked for the Formosan Association for Public Affairs as a policy intern, lobbying for US-Taiwan relations.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s