Chinese telecom giant Huawei Technology Co’s new Mate 60 Pro smartphone has drawn the market’s attention, mainly because it is powered by a 7-nanometer chip made by China’s Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC).
Some analysts say this means that China has broken through a US chip export ban, but what looks like good news about a technological breakthrough and commercial success for China is really a political propaganda show.
The US and its allies are waging a chip war against China, elevating the chip rivalry from the corporate to the national level. The national security aspects of this issue make political propaganda Huawei’s main focus, so it can disregard considerations of commercial cost to incorporate advanced-process chips, which are generally defined as those on a scale of 7-nanometers or smaller.
The firm seeks to create the illusion of strong sales and a business recovery, which helps the Chinese Communist Party’s leaders “maintain stability.”
The Mate 60 series ranges in price from about NT$24,000 to NT$35,000. Compared with the flagship phones of Apple Inc and Samsung Co, which cost NT$30,000 to NT$50,000, Huawei’s prices clearly do not make commercial sense.
In the post-COVID-19 economic quagmire and given the high prices of raw materials caused by the war between Russia and Ukraine, plus the chip ban imposed by the US and other countries, how can Huawei and SMIC hope to surpass Samsung and catch up with Apple in control of global supply chains, especially as there is no complete supply chain for Chinese-made chips?
Outside observers estimate that Huawei’s shipment plan for the second half of this year has grown by about 20 percent to between 5.5 million and 6 million units. This might look like a turnaround for Huawei, but can it deliver the products on schedule? Can it do so in one wave or only in batches?
People who buy electronics tend to be impatient. They often pre-order in response to promotions, but also often cancel orders and buy other products instead if they have to wait too long.
When the chip manufacturing process reaches the 7-nanometer stage, the next technological step is actually a giant hurdle. The cost of chip design and manufacturing at the advanced-process level increases greatly and the threshold requirements of the industrial chain also rise.
Many people think China has made a major technological breakthrough, but leading chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), for example, announced mass production of 3-nanometer wafers in December last year and its research and development efforts are advancing toward 2-nanometer technology. If SMIC wants to compete with TSMC, it clearly has a lot of catching up to do.
Despite China’s elevation of Huawei to the status of a national hero, a long and rocky path lies hidden behind the fog of political propaganda.
Chuang Mao-chieh works in the field of industry and economics.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS