Before an election, candidates always make promises to attract voters’ attention. The most common one is offering better welfare programs, such as health insurance. New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, has proposed full healthcare subsidies for people aged 65 or older, as well as indigenous people aged 55 to 64.
“Free healthcare for every senior, all of them,” Hou said at the time.
If a nation is fiscally stable and does not have a budget deficit, I would support any kind of social welfare policy. What worries me is when candidates make promises, do they ever think of where they would get the money to finance it? Could this policy go on for years? Would it be a half-baked policy implemented with a bang, only to fade with a whimper?
The most telling example is the one advocating “free textbooks.” During previous elections, many mayoral and county commissioner candidates proposed providing free textbooks. After they were elected, they did keep their promises. Fully funded by the local governments, all elementary and junior-high schools provided textbooks for free.
It should have been a wonderful thing for all, but the happiness did not last long. After a few years, textbooks were no longer free due to financial reasons. Those local governments were mocked as just trying too hard to impress. They also had to bear the consequences for years to come.
Compared with free textbooks, “free healthcare for all seniors” is a much bigger issue that needs to be carefully thought out. For one, Taiwan is an aging society, with people aged 65 or older comprising 14 percent of the population.
By 2025, when Taiwan is expected to become a super-aged society, the percentage is likely to reach 20; in other words, one out of five people would be 65 or older. Moreover, if the birthrate is lower than the mortality rate, the problems that an aging society must confront would be even more serious.
As the population of seniors continues to grow, the government would have to provide more and funds and resources to finance healthcare. Has the candidate promising “free healthcare for all seniors” thought this through?
It has become increasingly difficult for the government to make ends meet to support the National Health Insurance (NHI) system. The NHI supplementary premium policy was implemented to address this problem, and the premium has been raised several times.
Even with such careful planning, it is still hard to keep finances stable. If the government pushes forward with free healthcare for all citizens 65 or older without careful evaluation, the budget deficit would worsen and the system might go belly-up.
Also, from a relativist viewpoint, if seniors do not have to pay healthcare fees, others would have to pay more. This is not a fair arrangement and would make things harder for other age categories. Those advocating free healthcare must consider all these aspects carefully.
As a Taiwanese proverb says, an outsider would not understand the difficulty of doing the actual job; also, what has been said does not necessarily lead to a welcome result.
Those lacking experience in government do not know how difficult it is to run a government and make things work. Instead of making promises to voters, candidates should be more pragmatic and propose realistic policies that suit the country and which discerning voters can support.
Hu Yen
Taipei
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s