From Aug. 25 to Sunday, about 200 works were displayed in the exhibition “A Vision for Transforming Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Park” at C-LAB, which used to be the Air Force Command Headquarters. Unfortunately, only a few people got to see the exhibition, as the Ministry of Culture appeared to have lost interest in it.
When it comes to transitional justice, the question of how to transform the Chiang Kai-shek (CKS) Memorial Park has been subject to endless debate. Last year, the ministry commissioned three non-governmental organizations to organize a conceptual design competition called “100 Ways,” hoping to stimulate the creativity of participants to find new ways in which the park could be utilized.
Public submissions for the competition started in July last year, and in March, the judges chose the top five entries each for the student and open categories.
EXHIBITION DELAY
The exhibition was originally scheduled to be held at the CKS Memorial Park right after the winners were announced and to last for two-and-a-half months. However, the ministry postponed the exhibition to late last month, reduced its duration to 17 days and relocated it to C-LAB.
Separating the exhibition from the competition event and moving it made it look like the ministry was intentionally downplaying the exhibition, discouraging people from engaging with it.
This not only let hundreds of enthusiastic young people down, it essentially covered up their creativity. Moreover, it closed the space for dialogue on transitional justice — especially the complex issues associated with the CKS Memorial Park.
Many works in the exhibition did not exhibit a strong critical attitude toward historical injustices. Some people who might have expected the younger generation to express a sense of justice might have felt disappointed, but young people have their own perspective on the subject.
Participants disagreed with the original allocation of the park for commemorating authoritarianism; they hoped to transform the situation: Promoting more diverse activities in the park, for example, would highlight the importance of citizens and the rejection of authoritarianism that their life and liberty represent.
YOUNG PERSPECTIVE
This design orientation was active and coherent, showing the vision of the younger generation. It was an opportunity for further social debate on this issue. Why did the ministry turn its back on this, instead of promoting and making good use of the event?
Decisionmakers shied away from this contentious issue without understanding the collective consciousness of the younger generation on display in the exhibition. Such risk avoidance is only human, but it is the wrong way for people in positions of leadership to act.
DIALOGUE
The lifting of martial law and bringing about a transfer of power was the result of the efforts of courageous predecessors, and we should keep working on transitional justice. The ministry should not shirk its responsibility in this regard.
The exhibition organizers should let citizens seize this opportunity to communicate and extend the duration of the exhibition. The event should be hosted in central and southern Taiwan as well, and back to the CKS Memorial Park for two more months, giving citizens the opportunity to imagine the possibilities that the park offers.
Hochen Tan is a former minister of transportation and communications.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s