There was already considerable pent-up resentment among several Asian countries about China’s ambitions for world domination, but its recently released “standard map” showing sovereign territories of several countries as part of it has unleashed outrage and suspicion.
Although only a map, it is viewed by many of the affected countries as China’s attempt to covet their territories through its ploy of using “historical facts.”
The map, first released by the Chinese Ministry of Natural Resources, is also seen as an affront to many independent nations previously cautious about offending China due to its economic and military might.
The distortion of other countries’ national boundaries has caused a slew of protests by India, Malaysia, the Philippines, Russia and Vietnam; other countries affected by the map include Bhutan, Brunei, Japan and Taiwan. The map’s release, shortly before the start of the G20 summit in New Delhi was striking; it would have been quite embarrassing for Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) to face not only Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but also other leaders. Xi canceled his visit to the summit.
All the affected countries are appalled by the redrawing of their borders by a country whose “wolf warrior” conduct has been a source of concern and unease; they see China’s attempt to re-draw their territories — though on a map — as a blatant land grab.
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Wang Wenbin (汪文斌) called the map’s release “a routine practice in China’s exercise of sovereignty in accordance with the law.” He hoped that all the “relevant sides can stay objective and calm, and refrain from over-interpreting the issue.”
What did he mean by China’s exercise of sovereignty in accordance with law? Foreign affairs experts in countries affected by this distortion were scratching their heads, wondering if there was any hidden message.
Reactions in India were characterized by outrage, disdain and dismissiveness at China’s blunt attempts to change India’s northeastern borders, including the state of Arunachal Pradesh, shown as part of southern Tibet in the new map. Aksai Chin, which China has militarily occupied since its 1962 war with India, was never shown as Chinese territory before the 1920s; it was historically part of India’s northeastern region of Ladakh, and always part of British India since the mid-19th century. China also occupies a piece of Kashmir ceded to China in 1963 by Pakistan which had seized it during an invasion.
China’s aggressive conduct has also generated anger within India’s public; some politicians in India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the opposition alliance have called for upgrading ties with Taiwan, some even urging that the government give full Taiwan diplomatic recognition, unperturbed that this could lead to severance of India’s ties with China. Shashi Tharoor, an Indian politician belonging to the Congress Party and a former minister of state in India’s Ministry of External Affairs, urged the BJP government to retaliate and start issuing stapled visas in the passports of Chinese nationals from Tibet, as well as doing away with India’s “one China” policy.
China’s standoff with India at disputed border locations continues despite 19 rounds of talks between Indian and Chinese military experts to defuse tensions. Modi’s recent meeting with Xi at the BRICS summit in South Africa has not led to a disengagement so far.
China’s distortion has also upset other neighbors, particularly those claiming oil and mineral-rich islands in the South China Sea. The map reflects Beijing’s ambitions. It has been engaging in what critics call “salami slicing,” aimed at gradually usurping territories claimed by its neighbors. Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam have reacted angrily. China’s “nine-dash line,” which covers the disputed territories, has now become a “10-dash line” with Taiwan included. China’s claims, based on “historical facts,” do not have any validity before international bodies; the Permanaent Court of Arbitration in The Hague rejected China’s claims in the case of the South China Sea islands claimed by the Philippines.
China has also resurrected claims over Russian territories, despite the two nations’ iron-clad friendship. Moscow rejected Beijing’s claim of ownership over Bolshoi Ussuriysky island, which China calls Heixiazi (黑瞎子島).
While the world thought China had just three border disputes — with India in Ladakh and Andhra Pradesh, with Japan over the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台列嶼, the Senkaku Islands in Japan), and the South China Sea — Beijing has expanded its territorial claims in 15 countries. There is also Taiwan, with which China does not share a border, but wishes to annex.
Given the strong backlash, many experts see China’s growing aggression as a source of instability. China’s leadership should realize that China could become isolated, with many countries becoming fearful and distrustful of it. No amount of economic coercion or incentives would then bring it out of isolation. Trust between nations is like the proverbial vase; once broken, it will always show cracks even after being fixed.
Manik Mehta is a New York-based journalist who writes extensively on foreign affairs, the UN, US bilateral relations, global economics, trade and business.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS