There was already considerable pent-up resentment among several Asian countries about China’s ambitions for world domination, but its recently released “standard map” showing sovereign territories of several countries as part of it has unleashed outrage and suspicion.
Although only a map, it is viewed by many of the affected countries as China’s attempt to covet their territories through its ploy of using “historical facts.”
The map, first released by the Chinese Ministry of Natural Resources, is also seen as an affront to many independent nations previously cautious about offending China due to its economic and military might.
The distortion of other countries’ national boundaries has caused a slew of protests by India, Malaysia, the Philippines, Russia and Vietnam; other countries affected by the map include Bhutan, Brunei, Japan and Taiwan. The map’s release, shortly before the start of the G20 summit in New Delhi was striking; it would have been quite embarrassing for Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) to face not only Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but also other leaders. Xi canceled his visit to the summit.
All the affected countries are appalled by the redrawing of their borders by a country whose “wolf warrior” conduct has been a source of concern and unease; they see China’s attempt to re-draw their territories — though on a map — as a blatant land grab.
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Wang Wenbin (汪文斌) called the map’s release “a routine practice in China’s exercise of sovereignty in accordance with the law.” He hoped that all the “relevant sides can stay objective and calm, and refrain from over-interpreting the issue.”
What did he mean by China’s exercise of sovereignty in accordance with law? Foreign affairs experts in countries affected by this distortion were scratching their heads, wondering if there was any hidden message.
Reactions in India were characterized by outrage, disdain and dismissiveness at China’s blunt attempts to change India’s northeastern borders, including the state of Arunachal Pradesh, shown as part of southern Tibet in the new map. Aksai Chin, which China has militarily occupied since its 1962 war with India, was never shown as Chinese territory before the 1920s; it was historically part of India’s northeastern region of Ladakh, and always part of British India since the mid-19th century. China also occupies a piece of Kashmir ceded to China in 1963 by Pakistan which had seized it during an invasion.
China’s aggressive conduct has also generated anger within India’s public; some politicians in India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the opposition alliance have called for upgrading ties with Taiwan, some even urging that the government give full Taiwan diplomatic recognition, unperturbed that this could lead to severance of India’s ties with China. Shashi Tharoor, an Indian politician belonging to the Congress Party and a former minister of state in India’s Ministry of External Affairs, urged the BJP government to retaliate and start issuing stapled visas in the passports of Chinese nationals from Tibet, as well as doing away with India’s “one China” policy.
China’s standoff with India at disputed border locations continues despite 19 rounds of talks between Indian and Chinese military experts to defuse tensions. Modi’s recent meeting with Xi at the BRICS summit in South Africa has not led to a disengagement so far.
China’s distortion has also upset other neighbors, particularly those claiming oil and mineral-rich islands in the South China Sea. The map reflects Beijing’s ambitions. It has been engaging in what critics call “salami slicing,” aimed at gradually usurping territories claimed by its neighbors. Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam have reacted angrily. China’s “nine-dash line,” which covers the disputed territories, has now become a “10-dash line” with Taiwan included. China’s claims, based on “historical facts,” do not have any validity before international bodies; the Permanaent Court of Arbitration in The Hague rejected China’s claims in the case of the South China Sea islands claimed by the Philippines.
China has also resurrected claims over Russian territories, despite the two nations’ iron-clad friendship. Moscow rejected Beijing’s claim of ownership over Bolshoi Ussuriysky island, which China calls Heixiazi (黑瞎子島).
While the world thought China had just three border disputes — with India in Ladakh and Andhra Pradesh, with Japan over the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台列嶼, the Senkaku Islands in Japan), and the South China Sea — Beijing has expanded its territorial claims in 15 countries. There is also Taiwan, with which China does not share a border, but wishes to annex.
Given the strong backlash, many experts see China’s growing aggression as a source of instability. China’s leadership should realize that China could become isolated, with many countries becoming fearful and distrustful of it. No amount of economic coercion or incentives would then bring it out of isolation. Trust between nations is like the proverbial vase; once broken, it will always show cracks even after being fixed.
Manik Mehta is a New York-based journalist who writes extensively on foreign affairs, the UN, US bilateral relations, global economics, trade and business.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS