Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) has expanded on his so-called “Kinmen peace initiative” based on “one China, with each side having its own interpretation,” announcing that he would establish a “Kinmen peace foundation” and promote “peace” and “communication” across the Taiwan Strait by establishing a “cross-strait peace research institute.”
Gou, an independent candidate in next year’s presidential election, said that he would spend the rest of his life “pursuing cross-strait peace,” portraying himself as a “peace envoy.”
However, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has said that China would not renounce the use of force against Taiwan. The Chinese Communist Party’s endless gray-zone warfare and infiltration have damaged and divided Taiwanese society in many ways, while endangering regional security and stability.
China’s malicious actions show that it is the aggressor and is unilaterally changing the cross-strait “status quo.”
Amid this, Gou, from his July 17 opinion piece in the Washington Post to his recent pronouncements, accuses the Democratic Progressive Party of causing cross-strait tensions by not recognizing the mythical “1992 consensus,” which says that both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to “one China.”
By turning a blind eye to China’s malicious behavior and using his influence to promote this victim-blaming, Gou is appeasing the villain and distorting social justice.
What kind of peace does Gou want? The only kind of “peace” that China wants is “peaceful unification.”
Was the 1997 transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong from the UK to China not also “peaceful”? Today’s Hong Kong shows that rule by China is an irreversible disaster.
China has for many years promoted the anachronistic idea that “blood is thicker than water” and used Hong Kongers’ compassion to obtain material relief that helped China get through hard times. Later, Hong Kong companies contributed their talent, technology and capital to China, laying the basis for it to become the workshop of the world.
However, how does China treat Hong Kong now, after growing rich with the territory’s help?
Behind the bloody suppression of Hong Kong’s 2019 to 2020 protests against an extradition law, there has been a quieter process of plunder. After China took over Hong Kong, many people flooded in from other regions of China.
The huge differences between Hong Kongers and these newcomers in terms of values and culture disrupted the social balance. Cheap labor took away Hong Kongers’ job opportunities and social welfare, affecting their livelihoods. The interests of businesspeople who profited from the “China dividend” were built by stripping away the interests of ordinary Hong Kongers.
Moreover, China has invested heavily in unnecessary construction in Hong Kong in an attempt to solve its own overcapacity problem and it is still draining Hong Kong of funds after its real-estate bubble burst.
How many Hong Kongers who were once pro-China regret it now that they are suffering?
The 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration on the future of Hong Kong and the 1951 Seventeen Point Agreement on the “peaceful liberation” of Tibet prove that China is not to be trusted. The price to be paid for talking “peace” with China is clear.
Considering how many years Gou has been doing business in China, how could he not know what it has in mind?
He should stop trying to fool people.
Hong Tsun-ming, who is from Hong Kong, is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS