Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) has expanded on his so-called “Kinmen peace initiative” based on “one China, with each side having its own interpretation,” announcing that he would establish a “Kinmen peace foundation” and promote “peace” and “communication” across the Taiwan Strait by establishing a “cross-strait peace research institute.”
Gou, an independent candidate in next year’s presidential election, said that he would spend the rest of his life “pursuing cross-strait peace,” portraying himself as a “peace envoy.”
However, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has said that China would not renounce the use of force against Taiwan. The Chinese Communist Party’s endless gray-zone warfare and infiltration have damaged and divided Taiwanese society in many ways, while endangering regional security and stability.
China’s malicious actions show that it is the aggressor and is unilaterally changing the cross-strait “status quo.”
Amid this, Gou, from his July 17 opinion piece in the Washington Post to his recent pronouncements, accuses the Democratic Progressive Party of causing cross-strait tensions by not recognizing the mythical “1992 consensus,” which says that both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to “one China.”
By turning a blind eye to China’s malicious behavior and using his influence to promote this victim-blaming, Gou is appeasing the villain and distorting social justice.
What kind of peace does Gou want? The only kind of “peace” that China wants is “peaceful unification.”
Was the 1997 transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong from the UK to China not also “peaceful”? Today’s Hong Kong shows that rule by China is an irreversible disaster.
China has for many years promoted the anachronistic idea that “blood is thicker than water” and used Hong Kongers’ compassion to obtain material relief that helped China get through hard times. Later, Hong Kong companies contributed their talent, technology and capital to China, laying the basis for it to become the workshop of the world.
However, how does China treat Hong Kong now, after growing rich with the territory’s help?
Behind the bloody suppression of Hong Kong’s 2019 to 2020 protests against an extradition law, there has been a quieter process of plunder. After China took over Hong Kong, many people flooded in from other regions of China.
The huge differences between Hong Kongers and these newcomers in terms of values and culture disrupted the social balance. Cheap labor took away Hong Kongers’ job opportunities and social welfare, affecting their livelihoods. The interests of businesspeople who profited from the “China dividend” were built by stripping away the interests of ordinary Hong Kongers.
Moreover, China has invested heavily in unnecessary construction in Hong Kong in an attempt to solve its own overcapacity problem and it is still draining Hong Kong of funds after its real-estate bubble burst.
How many Hong Kongers who were once pro-China regret it now that they are suffering?
The 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration on the future of Hong Kong and the 1951 Seventeen Point Agreement on the “peaceful liberation” of Tibet prove that China is not to be trusted. The price to be paid for talking “peace” with China is clear.
Considering how many years Gou has been doing business in China, how could he not know what it has in mind?
He should stop trying to fool people.
Hong Tsun-ming, who is from Hong Kong, is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s