Having seen pictures of gorgeous mulberries on Facebook ads, a friend placed an order for five packs. When the mulberries arrived, not only was the quality completely different from what was advertised, there was no label on the packaging.
Concerned that the fruit might be an inferior product and wanting to return it, she tried to call the seller for more details, only to find out that the phone number on the package did not exist and the address was fake.
Moreover, the Line group the seller invited her to join had blocked her. There is nowhere for her to seek help.
My time assisting people to deal with cases of food purchase fraud on Facebook or Instagram has shown that a person who makes such a purchase in Taiwan enters a contractual relationship between US-based Meta Platforms Inc and the buyer, while Taiwan Facebook Ltd is not a party to the Terms of Service.
Therefore, once such fraud cases occur, only Meta, which has the right to operate “network services,” can be asked for the personal information — names, ID numbers, contact addresses, etc — linked to fraudulent food advertisements.
However, to register a Facebook account, all that is required is a name and a date of birth, both of which could be faked, a gender from among female, male or self-defined, and a mobile phone number or e-mail address.
How can authorities conduct follow-up investigations and penalize wrongdoing in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (行政程序法) if they lack information such as the perpetrator’s name, birth date, gender, ID number and residence?
There is no law in Taiwan to regulate and control people overseas posting false information on social media such as food fraud advertisements, but a law is necessary and urgently needed.
Legislation should be drafted as soon as possible to protect people’s rights and interests, and food safety.
The government must enact regulations to prevent fraud while protecting freedom of speech on the Internet.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a secretary at the Pingtung Public Health Bureau.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
RSS