Across the globe, data servers are humming, consuming megawatts and precious natural resources to bring life to our digital world.
The planet’s 8,000 or so data centers are the foundation of our online existence and will grow ever further with the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) — so much so that research estimates that by 2025, the IT industry could use 20 percent of all electricity produced and emit up to 5.5 percent of the world’s carbon.
This poses a real — and to some, increasingly urgent — question about the industry’s carbon footprint as start-ups and other companies fall behind Silicon Valley’s latest forward march.
“Pandora’s box is open,” said Arun Iyengar, chief executive officer of Untether AI, a highly specialized chipmaking company that strives to make AI more energy efficient.
“We can utilize AI in ways that enhance the climate requirements or we can ignore the climate requirements and find ourselves facing the consequences in a decade or so in terms of the impact,” Iyengar said.
The transformation of the world’s data servers to AI readiness is already well under way, in what one Google executive called a “once-in-a-generation inflection point in computing.”
However, the scope of the mission is huge.
The creation of generative AI tools such as GPT-4, which powers ChatGPT, or Google’s Palm2, behind the bot Bard, can be broken into two key stages, the actual “training” and then the execution, or “inference.”
In 2019, University of Massachusetts Amherst researchers trained several large-language models, and found that training a single AI model can emit the carbon equivalent of what five vehicles do over their lifetimes.
A more recent study by Google and the University of California, Berkeley reported that training GPT-3 resulted in 552 tonnes of carbon emissions, equivalent to driving a passenger vehicle 2 million kilometers.
OpenAI’s latest generation model, GPT-4, is trained on about 570 times more parameters — or inputs — than GPT-3, and the scale of these systems will only grow as AI becomes more powerful and ubiquitous.
Nvidia, AI’s chip giant, provides the processors that are indispensable for training, known as GPUs. And while they are more energy efficient than typical chips, they remain formidable consumers of power.
The other side of generative AI is deployment, or inference — when the trained model is applied to identify objects, respond to text prompts or whatever the use case might be.
Deployment does not necessarily need the computing heft of a Nvidia chip, but taken cumulatively, the endless interactions in the real world far outweigh training in terms of workload.
“Inference is going to be even more of a problem now with ChatGPT, which can be used by anyone and integrated into daily life through apps and Web searches,” said Lynn Kaack, assistant professor of computer science at the Hertie School in Berlin.
The biggest cloud companies insist that they are committed to being as energy efficient as possible.
Amazon Web Services pledges to be carbon-neutral by 2040, while Microsoft has pledged to be carbon-negative by 2030. The latest evidence that the companies are serious about energy efficiency is reassuring. Between 2010 and 2018, global data center energy use rose by only 6 percent, despite a 550 percent increase in workloads and computing instances, International Energy Agency data showed.
Silicon Valley’s AI tycoons believe discussions of AI’s current carbon footprint are beside the point and underplay its revolutionary potential.
The naysayers have it “backwards,” Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) told reporters on a recent visit to his company’s headquarters in California.
The mass deployment of AI and faster computing will in the end diminish the need to go to the world’s data clouds, he said.
AI’s superpowers will turn your laptop, vehicle or the device in your pocket into an energy-efficient supercomputer without the need to “retrieve” data from the cloud.
“In the future, there’ll be a little tiny model that sits on your phone and 90 percent of the pixels will be generated, 10 percent will be retrieved, instead of 100 percent retrieved — and so you’re going to save” energy, he said.
Meanwhile, OpenAI’s Sam Altman believes that AI will soon enough be able to build humanity a completely new future.
“I think once we have a really powerful super intelligence, addressing climate change will not be particularly difficult,” Altman said recently. “This illustrates how big we should dream... Think about a system where you can say: ‘Tell me how to make a lot of clean energy cheaply, tell me how to efficiently capture carbon and tell me how to build a factory to do this at planetary scale.’”
However, some experts worry that the mad dash for AI has elbowed out fears about the planet, at least for now.
“Large corporations are spending a lot of money right now deploying AI. I don’t think they are thinking about the environmental impact yet,” Iyengar said.
However, “I think that is coming,” he added.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s