In February, a student at Taichung Municipal Feng Yuan Senior High School killed himself, allegedly after long-term and collective bullying by school officials. Seven of those officials have been reassigned to another school by the Taichung Education Bureau, while the school’s director of student affairs was suspended.
Many consider the school’s investigation and report on the suicide a farce. First, it concluded that the school officials’ counseling and disciplining of the student did not constitute bullying. The report also included a questionable survey, in which five students were chosen from each class — but not from the class of the student who died — to answer whether the discipline was reasonable.
Misconduct by the student affairs director should have been considered a serious matter, but he only received a demerit from the school.
The bureau said that the report and the punishment for the school officials were unacceptable and inappropriate.
On Friday, a professional review committee was organized to review the report and the actions of the student affairs director. It determined that the conduct of the director contravened Article 18 of the Teachers’ Act (教師法) and they should be penalized in accordance with the regulation.
The committee said the director should receive a one-year suspension.
However, the Humanistic Education Foundation said that a suspension was insufficient. After a year, the director would be able to return to the school without facing any supervision or assessment.
Dismissal of the director would be a more appropriate way to handle the issue, as they would then have to compete with other candidates when seeking a new teaching position, and pass a screening process before they could be hired.
What is more perplexing is that the school’s report confirmed that “improper discipline” had occurred, but that the student had not been singled out. Therefore, the implication of the report is that students at Taichung Municipal Feng Yuan Senior High School are often subjected to demerits, body searches, intimidation, threats and discriminatory verbal abuse by school officials.
Even for a mentally mature adult with abundant social experience, this could be too much to handle. How would a high-school student be able to handle it? Does anyone believe the student killed himself simply out of the blue?
Moreover, on Thursday, Taichung Deputy Mayor Alicia Wang (王育敏) said that the city government would not accept the school’s report and demanded that it explain why the case was not considered bullying. Soon after, the school suspended the director for a year. This came as rapidly as thunder, and many wondered if the whole thing had been planned.
Under Article 3 of the Ministry of Education’s Regulations Governing Prevention and Control of Bullying on Campuses (校園霸凌防制準則), bullying is defined as any situation in which a person or group of people use speech, writing, images, signs, physical gestures, electronic communication or other means to directly or indirectly belittle, exclude, mistreat, harass or tease another person. The target of this harassment would be in a hostile and unfriendly environment, experiencing psychological, physical or financial harm, and could not safely study and participate in school activities.
What happened to the student at Taichung Municipal Feng Yuan Senior High School is extremely unfortunate. If the student’s suicide is considered unrelated to bullying, the ministry and other agencies should redefine “bullying.”
Chang Huey-por is a former president of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Emma Liu
The Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises, the largest naval exercise in the region, are aimed at deepening international collaboration and interaction while strengthening tactical capabilities and flexibility in tackling maritime crises. China was invited to participate in RIMPAC in 2014 and 2016, but it was excluded this year. The underlying reason is that Beijing’s ambitions of regional expansion and challenging the international order have raised global concern. The world has made clear its suspicions of China, and its exclusion from RIMPAC this year will bring about a sea change in years to come. The purpose of excluding China is primarily
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
War in the Middle East, global terrorism and the Ukraine war pose significant threats to the global economy. However, according to Global Guardian, a leading security solutions firm, a conflict between China and Taiwan would cause the greatest disruption since World War II. Its Taiwan Shock Index (TSI) analyzes the potential global impacts of such a war. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) rhetoric about rejuvenating the People’s Republic of China heavily emphasizes “reunification” with Taiwan. Experts differ on when this might happen. Some point to 2027, the centenary of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), as a symbolic and strategic milestone. Others
Many local news media last week reported that COVID-19 is back, citing doctors’ observations and the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) statistics. The CDC said that cases would peak this month and urged people to take preventive measures. Although COVID-19 has never been eliminated, it has become more manageable, and restrictions were dropped, enabling people to return to their normal way of life due to decreasing hospitalizations and deaths. In Taiwan, mandatory reporting of confirmed cases and home isolation ended in March last year, while the mask mandate at hospitals and healthcare facilities stopped in May. However, the CDC last week said the number