The newly established “mental health leave” works on three levels: counseling, sociology and even philosophy.
Elementary and middle-school students often find going to the counselor’s office in school difficult because doing so is considered a social taboo, and therefore embarrassing. Students who are asked to visit school counselors are often assumed to have misbehaved in some way. Furthermore, students who struggle with mental health problems and other difficulties are unlikely to be proactive in seeking out help and support.
National Taiwan University (NTU) has now implemented its new system for requesting mental health leave in what is a positive and healthy move for students. The problems college students encounter in their daily lives, studies, relationships and careers all have a significant impact on their lives and well-being. While NTU students might excel in their studies, that does not mean they are more capable of dealing with mental pressure than others.
Mental health leave aims to encourage students to seek help — not devalue themselves for exposing their mental issues — and find a way toward recovery through self-disclosure.
As for professors who demand class attendance, the system now provides a viable and open way for students to take leave for any mental health issues they might be experiencing. It also gives professors a chance to counsel students and allow time for self-care.
A student’s mental well-being needs support from the entire school. A college student’s mental state would improve only if more people are devoted to the support system.
With more students possessing healthier minds, Taiwan would have an even brighter future for generations to come.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Lee Chieh-yu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its