The newly established “mental health leave” works on three levels: counseling, sociology and even philosophy.
Elementary and middle-school students often find going to the counselor’s office in school difficult because doing so is considered a social taboo, and therefore embarrassing. Students who are asked to visit school counselors are often assumed to have misbehaved in some way. Furthermore, students who struggle with mental health problems and other difficulties are unlikely to be proactive in seeking out help and support.
National Taiwan University (NTU) has now implemented its new system for requesting mental health leave in what is a positive and healthy move for students. The problems college students encounter in their daily lives, studies, relationships and careers all have a significant impact on their lives and well-being. While NTU students might excel in their studies, that does not mean they are more capable of dealing with mental pressure than others.
Mental health leave aims to encourage students to seek help — not devalue themselves for exposing their mental issues — and find a way toward recovery through self-disclosure.
As for professors who demand class attendance, the system now provides a viable and open way for students to take leave for any mental health issues they might be experiencing. It also gives professors a chance to counsel students and allow time for self-care.
A student’s mental well-being needs support from the entire school. A college student’s mental state would improve only if more people are devoted to the support system.
With more students possessing healthier minds, Taiwan would have an even brighter future for generations to come.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Lee Chieh-yu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS