Although the local elections only took place last year, media and public attention has already moved on to next year’s presidential election. It seems that little attention has been given to whether the newly elected civil representatives are carrying out their duties properly, as outlined in Article 35 to 37 in the Local Government Act (地方制度法).
There has been little media coverage so far, let alone reviews or assessments of the representatives’ performances.
Recently, a local civil organization called Tainan City Council Watch (台南議會觀察聯盟) published a review report on the first meeting of the fourth session of the Tainan City Council. The review method relied on quantitative and qualitative research. Those who had uncovered major problems in proposals or achieved other feats received extra credit, while those who had a poor attendance rate or did not perform well during question-and-answer sessions had points deducted. The report commended the performance of 15 city councilors, while four were put on “probation,” requiring improvement.
From a local self-governance perspective, grassroots-level non-governmental organizations (NGOs) supervising local councils is a laudable milestone for regional democracy.
However, as local media have long been focused on events in Taipei, there has been little coverage about the report, whether in the press or digital media.
A “second democratic reform,” which focuses on decentralization, privatization of state enterprises and promoting civil political participation to address Taiwan’s stalled political reform, was the key recommendation proposed by former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) in his final years.
As decentralization was a main theme in the recommendation, Lee had called on the central government to empower local governments with more authority regarding personnel, education and finance because, judging by government efficiency and national finances at the time, the central government would be incapable of dealing with various tasks in a diverse society.
The idea echoed the famous saying that “all politics is local.” Establishing a well-founded and sustainable local democratic system or a fundamental degree of autonomy is tantamount to achieving a healthy, vibrant central democratic system.
Strangely, several incumbent Taipei councilors, who were hoping to gain an edge over others in next year’s legislative elections with publicity and media attention, started criticizing Kaohsiung’s Cianjhen Fishing Port renovation project, Tainan’s Shalun Smart Green Energy Science City and the Pingtung Baseball Field, which all fell beyond their jurisdiction. This kind of meddling, busybody behavior should be condemned in any city council, and would not be tolerated if there had been a Taipei City Council Watch.
The public should give more attention to NGOs such as Tainan City Council Watch, so that similar organizations can be established across Taiwan, thereby realizing a minimum level of decentralization. Their presence would serve as a supervisory rating system, providing local citizens with an impartial performance assessment of city or county councilors.
In this way, the local elections might finally shake off the pomposity that political campaigns bring, and instead introduce rational public discussion and debate.
Lo Cheng-chung is a professor and director of Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology’s Institute of Financial and Economic Law.
Translated by Rita Wang
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
RSS