On Aug. 23, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) visited Mount Taiwu (太武山) on Kinmen and chanced upon a group of children. He asked them a political question, namely whether they wanted war or peace.
Clearly asked on purpose, Gou’s question is highly inappropriate. Moreover, the question should have been directed at China rather than the residents of this Taiwanese island territory, adjacent to China. After all, it is China that wants to wage a war against Taiwan, not the other way around.
I would also like to ask Gou to imagine a situation: Let us suppose that the Gou family has an evil neighbor who says that the ownership of all the Gou family mansions and possessions belongs to him, while demanding that the Gou family live in harmony with him, and that they should be supervised by him. If the Gou family does not comply, the neighbor would fight against the Gous and beat them up. Will Gou agree with the neighbor’s proposal? Will he shout out, “I love peace, not war!”?
Gou used to say that enhancing Taiwan’s national defense meant provoking China. In that case, would Gou be willing to dismantle the security equipment of his mansions all over the world? Would he lay off all his security staff?
It is worth mentioning that Gou’s father served as a police officer. If, according to Gou’s thinking, peace could only be achieved through the total removal of self-defense, then society would not need any police.
History provides us with a lesson: All the emperors, officials and commoners of the Song Dynasty had hoped for peace, but how did the Song Dynasty end up? How humiliating it must have been for the Northern Song Dynasty to lose its imperial capital in the Jingkang Incident (靖康之恥). During the Naval Battle of Mount Ya (崖山海戰), hundreds of thousands of Southern Song soldiers, officials and civilians committed suicide by jumping into the sea. More recently, those Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) soldiers who surrendered to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the Chinese Civil War ended up in misery. What does Gou have to say about this?
Gou only dares to criticize President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡-英文), but not Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平-). When he meets with Xi, he bows and kowtows to him, showing his full-fledged respect. How could this kind of person ever become the president of Taiwan?
Gou should know that the peace-loving Swiss still conduct mandatory military service for all able-bodied male citizens. Although Switzerland is surrounded by friendly democratic countries, no one dares to bully the Swiss. Unlike Switzerland, Taiwan has an evil neighbor next door, just as Ukraine does with Russia. In this sense, Taiwan must enhance its national defense.
For any sovereign and independent country, strengthening one’s national defense is not the same as provoking others. Only Gou and the politicians of the two opposition parties, the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party, conflate the two. Were any of them to become president-elect of Taiwan, would there be any future for Taiwan?
Gou has almost everything he needs to live a comfortable life. However, what he lacks most is the ability to empathize with others. The same goes for the other two opposition parties. They never empathize and put themselves in somebody else’s shoes.
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Emma Liu
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
RSS