Stadiums are not ATMs
On Aug. 24, the Hsinchu City government released its Professional Baseball Existing Subsurface and Surface Playing Field Conditions Report, attracting more ht 30,000 online visitors who downloaded it within two hours. The interest was so great that the activity caused the official Web site to temporarily crash.
The way Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) has dealt with the Hsinchu Baseball Stadium is exactly the same as how former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) dealt with the Taipei Dome. They both kicked the can down the road, treating public issues as a kind of political ATM to be used for political gain. They not only increased social costs, but also affected sports fans’ rights and interests.
As a baseball lover, I would like to ask Kao: When will the renovations be finished? When will the stadium reopen and fans be allowed back in?
After Ko was elected Taipei mayor, he listed the Taipei Dome as his first priority among the other “five major corruptions,” established an investigation team and spent years on it. However, after two terms, the Taipei Dome issue has remained unsolved, it remains closed to the public, and the investigation team could not find answers.
The investigation started with much fanfare and propaganda, but then fizzled out. We should not hold our breath waiting for Ko to apologize.
After spending NT$1.8 million (US$56,495) of taxpayers’ money within nine months, Hsinchu Baseball Stadium’s improvement project under Kao’s leadership has seen no progress. I would like to kindly ask Kao: Who is to blame?
Municipal administration requires continuous devotion. Now that Kao has been elected Hsinchu’s mayor, she should bear the responsibility of renovating the Hsinchu Baseball Stadium, finish the renovation as soon as possible, and give a safe and comfy playing field back to baseball players and fans. That is the first and foremost task that she should address.
Kao, like Ko and the Taipei Dome, is using the Hsinchu Baseball Stadium as her political ATM where she could withdraw political benefits.
Kao should abide by Ko’s motto and “do whatever needs to be done.” If there are legal issues with the baseball field, then she should turn to the judicial process, allowing prosecutors to bring the truth to light. If there are engineering failures, then she should order the company in charge to carry on with the renovations.
The issue with the Hsinchu Baseball Stadium falls within the field of engineering, so the solution should also belong to engineering professionals.
For her part, Kao should use her skills as a techie, find a way to finish the renovation project immediately, and take the citizens out to ball games in Hsinchu Baseball Stadium again.
A mayor with high efficiency and a sense of responsibility should be able to accomplish that.
Hu Yen
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS