New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, has pledged to remove the Barthel index requirement — an assessment used in clinical practice and research to measure someone’s ability to complete activities of daily living — for elderly people seeking to hire a foreign caregiver.
Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) also vowed that the government would make it easier for families in need of hiring foreign caregivers so that everybody, regardless of age, illness or financial situation, would have access to care.
The long-term care plan does not subsidize the cost of hiring live-in migrant caregivers. As a monthly salary of NT$30,000 to NT$40,000 is a struggle for most families, only affluent families can employ migrant caregivers, while disadvantaged people apply for long-term care services. Without other modifications, most families would not benefit from relaxing migrant caregiver hiring rules.
Hong Kong’s and Singapore’s examples had people calling for the government to relax application rules for migrant caregivers. In these two places, people can apply for foreign caregivers without any illness or age requirements. The local governments would subsidize families with elderly members diagnosed with dementia or disabilities when they apply for foreign caregivers, as foreign caregiving is part of their long-term care policy.
The governments there also subsidize families with senior members diagnosed with dementia or disabilities when being placed in nursing homes or applying for in-home care. Taiwan’s Long-term Care Plan 2.0 does not subsidize any costs for hiring foreign caregivers, nor is there any financial aid for nursing home costs. The reason for this was to “discourage families from outsourcing the care of family members to others.”
The government should relax rules for foreign caregiver applications and introduce complementary measures as soon as possible. With the population in Taiwan aged 80 or above being about 1 million, while a large percentage of the population under 80 are using long-term care services, the need for foreign caregivers would see a massive jump once application rules are relaxed. As there are 30,000 “absconded” migrant caregivers out of 220,000, the situation would only worsen once rules are relaxed. Singapore’s solution for deterring migrant caregivers from leaving their jobs prematurely is heavy penalties, and employers who hire runaway caregivers could receive a jail sentence.
Once application rules are relaxed, families who have light care needs would no longer adopt Long-term Care 2.0 for a few hours of caregiving service, but would instead apply for migrant caregivers for all-day care. This would have a profound impact on native home caregivers and their job opportunities. Thus, the government would have to overhaul application rules for foreign caregivers along with Long-term Care 2.0 so that they can supplement each other instead of running as parallel systems.
One solution is to integrate foreign caregivers into the long-term care plan, and provide subsidies to families who are hiring foreign caregivers for elderly people who are assessed as having dementia or are disabled, while others pay the full costs themselves.
As for foreign caregivers who have received government subsidies, they would need training and supervision to ensure nursing quality. Native home caregivers should not fear competition, as they have advantages as native speakers and better caregiving skills, and are fit to take on more challenging cases. Only in this way can families with caregiving needs benefit from relaxation of application rules.
Shen Chen-lan is a physician.
Translated by Rita Wang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS