Despite an approaching typhoon, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) on Tuesday departed for the annual Shanghai-Taipei forum in China. The twin-city forum was launched in 2010 by then-Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) during the administration of then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). It was continued under his successor, Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), now chairman of the Taiwan People’s Party.
Chiang tried to allay Taipei residents’ concerns about potential heavy rainfall and high winds that the typhoon could bring by saying that he had left Taipei Deputy Mayor Lee Shu-chuan (李四川) in charge during his absence — even though people voted for him, not Lee, to be Taipei mayor. Chiang’s decision to attend the forum over staying to oversee disaster response and management shows how he prioritizes relations with China, regardless of potential damage or loss of life back home.
In defending his decision, Chiang said: “Taipei is the most developed area in Taiwan and, as Taipei mayor, I have a responsibility to grasp any opportunity to strive for the prosperous development of the city and the nation.”
The forum has served as a conduit to maintain dialogue between the cities of Taipei and Shanghai, despite changes in party politics or cross-strait relations, he added.
Cross-strait relations are fraught, which is not what Taiwanese want to see, and while there is friction between the two sides about exports of agricultural and fishery products, it needs to be solved through talks, he said.
“Cross-strait relations are complicated and cannot be simplified to a few sentences, so there must be a mechanism for dialogue,” he said, adding that action is needed to resolve friction.
Dialogue is indeed the most direct form of communication, and individuals and groups rely on dialogue to maintain relations.
However, the prerequisite for dialogue is mutual respect, to recognize the other as an autonomous individual or organization. Without this recognition, dialogue is conducted in vain, and can lead to belittling oneself or distrust.
If dialogue could bring stability, then people would not have conflicts and nations would not go to war with one another. To add insult to injury, Taiwan’s current enemy is none other than the Chinese Communist Party, a power-hungry, autocratic regime that pays little heed to human lives and harbors the ambition to annex Taiwan by force. To realize its agenda, it has put numerous resources toward waging cognitive warfare, creating rifts in Taiwanese society, and undermining public morale and national identity — in hopes that Taiwan will capitulate without Beijing firing a single bullet.
Chiang has no right to see himself as an ambassador of peace and stability. Peace is not achieved through dialogue, but by the military force and power that a nation possesses.
Furthermore, is Chiang “maintaining dialogue” on behalf of the entire Taiwanese population or as the Taipei mayor — an “independent city” without any administrative affiliations with other cities?
It is unlikely that Chiang would dare protest China’s saber rattling and cognitive warfare against Taiwan while in Shanghai, or even have the guts to introduce himself as the Taipei mayor of the Republic of China.
At most, Chiang is likely to attend the forum in high spirits while ending up as another chess piece in China’s “united front” campaign. The so-called twin-city forum only gives the global community cause to question Taiwan’s resolve and determination with regards to countering China, and is another opportunity for Beijing to repeat its stance that “Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.” No good can come out of the forum.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Rita Wang
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s