Facing a seventh consecutive monthly increase in the youth unemployment rate, the Chinese government on Aug. 15 announced that it would suspend publication of the figures. The move has raised international concerns about the country’s worsening, nontransparent economy.
The unemployment rate among those aged 16 to 24 in China was 17.3 percent in January, 18.1 percent in February, 19.6 percent in March, 20.4 percent in April, 20.8 percent in May and a record 21.3 percent in June, meaning more than one in five young Chinese did not have a job. Chinese academics even estimated that the actual unemployment rate was 46 percent, because young people in rural townships had not been surveyed. The Chinese National Bureau of Statistics said it stopped releasing the youth unemployment rate due to a need to “optimize the survey approach,” but did not say when it would start releasing the figures again.
It is not the first time Beijing has restricted access to official data it considers unflattering or politically embarrassing. Since 2017, China has also stopped sharing its fertility rate data. A Chinese media report recently gave a rare insight into the country’s demographic crisis, saying its fertility rate last year plunged to a record low of 1.09. That would worsen the country’s negative population growth and shrinking labor force. A Bloomberg report said that Chinese figures crucial to foreign investors have become unavailable, including bond transactions, corporate registration data, land sales, currency reserves, COVID-19 deaths and academic information, while politicians’ biographies can be erased, just like when China’s foreign minister was abruptly removed from his role without explanation last month.
By covering up unpleasant statistics, Beijing intends to blind its disillusioned citizens and pacify discontented young Chinese, especially as such information could be considered a threat to its rule. The Chinese government has even removed several prominent writers’ social media posts on the country’s unemployment rate or stock market.
These moves suggest that crucial benchmark data can be highly politicized in China, and that there could be more “ bad news” regarding the country’s economy.
While US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo this week met her Chinese counterpart to keep communications open, US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan criticized China for reducing access to its economic data and cracking down on firms in China that had been sharing such data, calling its behavior “irresponsible.”
The lack of economic transparency has partially contributed to foreign investors’ doubts about China, as Chinese State Administration of Foreign Exchange data showed that direct foreign investment to China in the second quarter of this year had declined 87 percent year-on-year — the largest drop on record. Taiwan’s investment in ASEAN markets in the first half of this year surpassed the volume bound for China, indicating another shift.
The Mainland Affairs Council has warned Taiwanese traveling to China to refrain from talking about sensitive issues the Chinese government is trying to cover up to avoid being detained.
However, Taiwan still needs to be cautious and confront the flow of young Taiwanese going to China to work and study, especially as Beijing is offering thousands of job opportunities via a state-backed work program, aiming to recruit young Taiwanese talent for its “united front” purposes.
Some Chinese social media users have mocked their government, saying: “Covering your mouth and closing your eyes, can that really solve the problem?”
Yet Beijing’s freedom of information curbs not only makes cross-strait exchanges meaningless, but increase the risks Taiwanese and all foreigners could face in China.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS