Facing a seventh consecutive monthly increase in the youth unemployment rate, the Chinese government on Aug. 15 announced that it would suspend publication of the figures. The move has raised international concerns about the country’s worsening, nontransparent economy.
The unemployment rate among those aged 16 to 24 in China was 17.3 percent in January, 18.1 percent in February, 19.6 percent in March, 20.4 percent in April, 20.8 percent in May and a record 21.3 percent in June, meaning more than one in five young Chinese did not have a job. Chinese academics even estimated that the actual unemployment rate was 46 percent, because young people in rural townships had not been surveyed. The Chinese National Bureau of Statistics said it stopped releasing the youth unemployment rate due to a need to “optimize the survey approach,” but did not say when it would start releasing the figures again.
It is not the first time Beijing has restricted access to official data it considers unflattering or politically embarrassing. Since 2017, China has also stopped sharing its fertility rate data. A Chinese media report recently gave a rare insight into the country’s demographic crisis, saying its fertility rate last year plunged to a record low of 1.09. That would worsen the country’s negative population growth and shrinking labor force. A Bloomberg report said that Chinese figures crucial to foreign investors have become unavailable, including bond transactions, corporate registration data, land sales, currency reserves, COVID-19 deaths and academic information, while politicians’ biographies can be erased, just like when China’s foreign minister was abruptly removed from his role without explanation last month.
By covering up unpleasant statistics, Beijing intends to blind its disillusioned citizens and pacify discontented young Chinese, especially as such information could be considered a threat to its rule. The Chinese government has even removed several prominent writers’ social media posts on the country’s unemployment rate or stock market.
These moves suggest that crucial benchmark data can be highly politicized in China, and that there could be more “ bad news” regarding the country’s economy.
While US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo this week met her Chinese counterpart to keep communications open, US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan criticized China for reducing access to its economic data and cracking down on firms in China that had been sharing such data, calling its behavior “irresponsible.”
The lack of economic transparency has partially contributed to foreign investors’ doubts about China, as Chinese State Administration of Foreign Exchange data showed that direct foreign investment to China in the second quarter of this year had declined 87 percent year-on-year — the largest drop on record. Taiwan’s investment in ASEAN markets in the first half of this year surpassed the volume bound for China, indicating another shift.
The Mainland Affairs Council has warned Taiwanese traveling to China to refrain from talking about sensitive issues the Chinese government is trying to cover up to avoid being detained.
However, Taiwan still needs to be cautious and confront the flow of young Taiwanese going to China to work and study, especially as Beijing is offering thousands of job opportunities via a state-backed work program, aiming to recruit young Taiwanese talent for its “united front” purposes.
Some Chinese social media users have mocked their government, saying: “Covering your mouth and closing your eyes, can that really solve the problem?”
Yet Beijing’s freedom of information curbs not only makes cross-strait exchanges meaningless, but increase the risks Taiwanese and all foreigners could face in China.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS