Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) wants it to be known that he believes in the democratic process, and he has made it clear that he has absolutely no concept of conventional party political wisdom. His announcement on Monday of his intention to stand as an independent candidate in next year’s presidential election has left many political commentators scratching their heads, due to the glaring contradiction between his stated purpose and the obvious outcome.
Gou is running against New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential nominee, and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), splitting the vote against Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) candidate.
Gou is framing his campaign as a call for “unity” among the putative “anti-green coalition” of opposition candidates. He is a competent, successful and intelligent man, but his plan to create unity out of division requires monumental effort to understand. It is either brilliant or daft, but nowhere in between.
In his news conference announcing his bid, he said that he is an entrepreneur with nearly five decades of experience, asking: “Who else is better suited to lead Taiwan’s political sphere?” The answer is an experienced politician with proven competence in policymaking and governance — not him.
Perhaps Gou is doubling down on his invitation to Hou and Ko to “have a coffee” and discuss a strategy to bring down the DPP administration, after they rebuffed his earlier invitation. His intention to enter the race only makes sense if he is attempting to get Hou and Ko to take him seriously, and to take him on as a trusted partner with a shared goal, even though he has done so much in the past few weeks to erode that trust. This would only work if he withdraws before the end of the campaign, but all indications are that he wants to see this through to the end. Neither Ko nor Hou stand to gain anything from engaging with him.
Even if this is a genuine attempt to force “unity” in the anti-green alliance, his entry into the field will result in mudslinging among him, Hou and Ko, with none of them emerging untainted. That would only benefit the DPP. Whatever Gou is thinking, he has just injected a fascinating new dynamic into this presidential campaign, and not least for what it says of the rise and fall of the KMT.
After decades as a party-state, followed by a period of two-party politics, Taiwan has waited a long time for a third force to break through. At one point, this might have been the New Power Party, but it has been Ko’s TPP, formed in 2019, that has taken on that mantle. In opinion polls, although not yet in elections, the TPP has all but overtaken the KMT as the DPP’s main rival. Now, Gou is shaking things up further. Are we witnessing the demise of the “century-old party”?
Whatever Gou’s plans for Hou, it is unthinkable that the KMT would let its candidate play second fiddle to a man it has rejected as its own nominee twice. That would be a fall too far. It is astounding that Gou would think it might consider that proposition.
The KMT is clearly rattled by Gou’s announcement, and has said it would discipline any member who offers him support. At the same time, even after the disruption and reneging on his promise to support Hou, the party has said it still hopes Gou might return to the KMT fold. That, too, is astounding.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS