Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) wants it to be known that he believes in the democratic process, and he has made it clear that he has absolutely no concept of conventional party political wisdom. His announcement on Monday of his intention to stand as an independent candidate in next year’s presidential election has left many political commentators scratching their heads, due to the glaring contradiction between his stated purpose and the obvious outcome.
Gou is running against New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential nominee, and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), splitting the vote against Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) candidate.
Gou is framing his campaign as a call for “unity” among the putative “anti-green coalition” of opposition candidates. He is a competent, successful and intelligent man, but his plan to create unity out of division requires monumental effort to understand. It is either brilliant or daft, but nowhere in between.
In his news conference announcing his bid, he said that he is an entrepreneur with nearly five decades of experience, asking: “Who else is better suited to lead Taiwan’s political sphere?” The answer is an experienced politician with proven competence in policymaking and governance — not him.
Perhaps Gou is doubling down on his invitation to Hou and Ko to “have a coffee” and discuss a strategy to bring down the DPP administration, after they rebuffed his earlier invitation. His intention to enter the race only makes sense if he is attempting to get Hou and Ko to take him seriously, and to take him on as a trusted partner with a shared goal, even though he has done so much in the past few weeks to erode that trust. This would only work if he withdraws before the end of the campaign, but all indications are that he wants to see this through to the end. Neither Ko nor Hou stand to gain anything from engaging with him.
Even if this is a genuine attempt to force “unity” in the anti-green alliance, his entry into the field will result in mudslinging among him, Hou and Ko, with none of them emerging untainted. That would only benefit the DPP. Whatever Gou is thinking, he has just injected a fascinating new dynamic into this presidential campaign, and not least for what it says of the rise and fall of the KMT.
After decades as a party-state, followed by a period of two-party politics, Taiwan has waited a long time for a third force to break through. At one point, this might have been the New Power Party, but it has been Ko’s TPP, formed in 2019, that has taken on that mantle. In opinion polls, although not yet in elections, the TPP has all but overtaken the KMT as the DPP’s main rival. Now, Gou is shaking things up further. Are we witnessing the demise of the “century-old party”?
Whatever Gou’s plans for Hou, it is unthinkable that the KMT would let its candidate play second fiddle to a man it has rejected as its own nominee twice. That would be a fall too far. It is astounding that Gou would think it might consider that proposition.
The KMT is clearly rattled by Gou’s announcement, and has said it would discipline any member who offers him support. At the same time, even after the disruption and reneging on his promise to support Hou, the party has said it still hopes Gou might return to the KMT fold. That, too, is astounding.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS