The Chinese Communist Party has routinely used cultural folk elements such as the belief in deities such as Matsu for its “united front” work to propagate the idea that Taiwan belongs to China.
In a recent “united front” video, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army attempted to play the “Matsu card.”
Folk gods and goddesses are viewed differently in Taiwan and China. If these folk beliefs are to be seen as cultural assets, where is the culture most developed?
In ancient China, it was an emperor’s duty to worship heaven and earth. During the Ming and Qing dynasties, emperors called themselves “ministers of the mountains and rivers” to heaven, while ordinary people worshiped their own ancestors. From an ancient Chinese perspective, Taiwan has been so religious that if academics such as Han Yu (韓愈) and Ouyang Xiu (歐陽修) — who attached great importance to etiquette — came to Taiwan as officials, they would have done their best to put down the public’s folk beliefs.
The concept of “God bless Taiwan” has long been a part of Taiwanese daily life, but there has rarely been the concept of “God bless China” except in the case of the Boxer Rebellion during the late Qing Dynasty.
While Chinese folk culture originated in China, it has continued to develop in Taiwan, but which side is more important to such cultural assets?
Pearl milk tea, also known as “bubble tea,” is a common drink found in Taiwan, and its current version was developed in this nation.
However, milk tea originated from the Eurasian nomads. Does this mean that Taiwan, a milk-tea-loving nation, should be unified with Mongolia, Kazakhstan or other Eurasian countries?
Buddhism is also common in China. If China wanted to use Matsu as a “united front” tool against Taiwan, should India then use Buddha as a tool against China when another border dispute breaks out between them?
Jimway Chang
Kaohsiung
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS