The Chinese Communist Party has routinely used cultural folk elements such as the belief in deities such as Matsu for its “united front” work to propagate the idea that Taiwan belongs to China.
In a recent “united front” video, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army attempted to play the “Matsu card.”
Folk gods and goddesses are viewed differently in Taiwan and China. If these folk beliefs are to be seen as cultural assets, where is the culture most developed?
In ancient China, it was an emperor’s duty to worship heaven and earth. During the Ming and Qing dynasties, emperors called themselves “ministers of the mountains and rivers” to heaven, while ordinary people worshiped their own ancestors. From an ancient Chinese perspective, Taiwan has been so religious that if academics such as Han Yu (韓愈) and Ouyang Xiu (歐陽修) — who attached great importance to etiquette — came to Taiwan as officials, they would have done their best to put down the public’s folk beliefs.
The concept of “God bless Taiwan” has long been a part of Taiwanese daily life, but there has rarely been the concept of “God bless China” except in the case of the Boxer Rebellion during the late Qing Dynasty.
While Chinese folk culture originated in China, it has continued to develop in Taiwan, but which side is more important to such cultural assets?
Pearl milk tea, also known as “bubble tea,” is a common drink found in Taiwan, and its current version was developed in this nation.
However, milk tea originated from the Eurasian nomads. Does this mean that Taiwan, a milk-tea-loving nation, should be unified with Mongolia, Kazakhstan or other Eurasian countries?
Buddhism is also common in China. If China wanted to use Matsu as a “united front” tool against Taiwan, should India then use Buddha as a tool against China when another border dispute breaks out between them?
Jimway Chang
Kaohsiung
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS