More than a dozen Taiwanese universities have reportedly launched a system of psychological leave.
Psychological leave allows students to take a break from their studies if they feel burnt out and need time to recover.
Schools allow students to take three days off per semester without a doctor’s note, but teachers and universities’ psychological counseling centers are required to ask them about their health. Despite the news of a low birthrate in Taiwan, this measure is good news for higher education.
However, teachers need psychological leave too, especially part-time staff or substitute teachers who are not yet formal teachers. Often, the procedure for teachers to take leave is inconvenient.
First, they need to find another teacher to substitute for their classes or schedule time to make up for missed hours. Next, taking leave from work might result in receiving unfavorable feedback on their teacher’s evaluation at the end of the semester. Therefore, most teachers are reluctant to take any leave unless it is absolutely necessary.
In Taiwan, university teachers are responsible for three major tasks: teaching, research and administration. The chance for promotion is heavily dependent on a teacher’s research performance, as this aspect is considered the most important part of their work. Since writing research papers and preparing for classes requires a lot of time, universities might reward teachers by reducing teaching hours to relieve their burden, allowing them to focus on research.
However, although the ideal situation, in many cases it is not possible to meet these expectations. For example, when it comes to handling student needs, teachers are tasked with marking students’ schoolwork, their daily lives and other sources of stress.
Teachers also need to participate in meetings, such as administrative and academic seminars, while trying hard to recruit students — which could contribute to a fragmented research schedule.
The result is that it might not always be easy for teachers to take leave. Many teachers feel under pressure, attending work even when they are sick for fear of student complaints that could affect their evaluation.
Students can take psychological leave, but the pressure on teachers is not insubstantial in comparison. Many teachers suffer physical and psychological problems due to research pressures, while insomnia and anxiety is common in this profession. Naturally, this would indirectly impact the quality of teaching.
While the public focuses on students’ physical and mental health, teachers’ wellbeing is also an important issue. They are humans, too, after all. As universities create a friendly environment with a virtuous cycle for students, universities should also provide teachers with a chance to catch their breath while caring for students.
Liu Wei-ting is a university assistant professor.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS