Microsoft Corp has launched a major modification of its controversial US$69 billion deal for acquiring gaming-software rival Activision Blizzard Inc. Like those irritating Windows updates, installation and reboot will be a tortuous affair, but the pain and the wait might well be worth it for all sides.
The rejig has been constructed to assuage the concerns of the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), which had blocked the acquisition. As things stand, the regulator remains the chief obstacle to the transaction closing.
European trustbusters have already granted approval. The US Federal Trade Commission, which needed to prove its case before a judge, lost in court against Microsoft.
At issue is the effect that Microsoft’s control over Activision’s highly popular catalog would have on the nascent but growing market for streaming games from the cloud. Activision owns bestselling titles such as the first-person shooter franchise Call of Duty. The CMA feared that Microsoft’s cloud rivals would be unable to compete effectively if the tech giant’s streaming platform got such a big jump start.
OTHER STREAMING
Microsoft initially attempted to address this concern by offering to give owners of Activision games the right to stream them elsewhere. It backed that up by signing 10-year deals with the likes of Nvdia Corp so that rivals could provide the content. European regulators cheered this move for giving consumers a cloud-gaming option currently unavailable today.
However, the CMA reckoned this would unhelpfully tie the cloud-gaming market to one particular business model, whereby consumers bought games from one place to stream them elsewhere. The UK regulator anticipated a better future without the deal, one where Activision would be incentivized to make its content directly available to a host of competing cloud platforms that could then resell it however they please, including via multi-game subscription services and to non-Windows platforms.
Microsoft’s new transaction structure appears to address the CMA’s concerns head-on. It gives video-game maker Ubisoft Entertainment SA cloud distribution rights outside the European Economic Area for all of Activision’s current catalog, plus any new content produced in the next 15 years.
The French firm keeps those rights in perpetuity and can make those games available to competing cloud platforms as it pleases.
It is a completely different transaction, with a more solid structural solution to the CMA’s worries.
Will it be enough? One fresh objection would be that as we approach 2040, Ubisoft would lose rights to new Microsoft-Activision titles. So it is not a permanent fix.
If the concern is to allow the cloud gaming market to evolve and mature according to consumer preferences, there seems to be plenty of time and latitude for that to happen.
Might the deal with Ubisoft dampen the incentive for Microsoft to innovate in cloud gaming, given it will not be raking in 100 percent of the upside? That also seems like a weak challenge given that the tech giant will still earn royalties.
REAINGING HURDLES
The tone of the CMA’s statements around the development is positive — although the body says there is no “green light” yet. It will have to review this new deal on its own merits in line with the usual framework, with a preliminary investigation due to be completed by mid-October. The next step after that is usually either outright clearance or a second look should there be additional concerns. Still, if the CMA finds issues during this initial probe, merging parties do get a chance to propose remedies.
Given all that and bearing in mind how much work has already been undertaken, the chances of this transaction getting cleared appear to have increased considerably. The complicating factor is whether a revised deal means that the European Commission will want to reexamine the situation.
The CMA has taken a lot of flak for opposing a takeover based on concerns about a market that is still so immature. Yet this saga could conclude with the regulator’s credibility intact — or even reinforced.
The US tried and failed to block the transaction. Europe rolled over when Microsoft proposed some tweaks. By at first prohibiting the deal, the UK has now prompted Microsoft to propose an alternative that looks better for gamers.
If the CMA can show that it is possible to be tough but pragmatic, that would be a good outcome for dealmakers and consumers alike.
Chris Hughes is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering deals. Previously, he worked for Reuters Breakingviews, the Financial Times and the Independent newspaper. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS