The 65th anniversary of the 823 Artillery Bombardment of Kinmen County took place on Wednesday, commemorating the Aug. 23, 1958, date, which marked the beginning of the Second Taiwan Strait Crisis. While the battle signifies protection of Taiwan’s security, it would be more accurate to say that it was a continuation of the civil war between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). If the KMT government had not brought the Republic of China (ROC) to Taiwan following the end of World War II, it is possible that, after some time under US occupation, Taiwan would have become an independent country.
When the ROC and its government were established, the territory of Taiwan was ruled by Japan, not the ROC. This fact proves that the CCP’s claim that “Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory” is a fabricated justification for invading Taiwan.
It was because of Taiwan’s existence that the US government responded to the 823 Artillery Bombardment by dispatching the US Navy’s Seventh Fleet to help the ROC government defend the islands of Kinmen and Matsu. This prolonged the legal status of the ROC, as unlike Taiwan, Kinmen and Matsu were within the ROC’s territory at the time of its foundation.
The ROC is a special country. In legal terms, Taiwan, which came under US military occupation following Japan’s defeat in World War II, was entrusted to be managed by the ROC government.
However, Taiwan has developed the features and status of a nation state, having all the requisite elements of population, land, government and sovereignty. The only problem is that the continued application of the ROC Constitution does not closely suit the real situation. As this is the case, there is no need for independence, but what is needed is an overhaul of its national institutions.
In commemorating the 823 Artillery Bombardment, there is no need to state once again that it was the reason behind Taiwan’s security, and it is redundant to repeat discussions about what differences might exist between the ROC’s effective governance of Taiwan in comparison to Kinmen and Matsu. This is because Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu have become a community of common destiny.
Since they are all governed by the free and democratic ROC, they should unite as one to resist any aggression against our nation by the despotic CCP regime.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS