The 65th anniversary of the 823 Artillery Bombardment of Kinmen County took place on Wednesday, commemorating the Aug. 23, 1958, date, which marked the beginning of the Second Taiwan Strait Crisis. While the battle signifies protection of Taiwan’s security, it would be more accurate to say that it was a continuation of the civil war between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). If the KMT government had not brought the Republic of China (ROC) to Taiwan following the end of World War II, it is possible that, after some time under US occupation, Taiwan would have become an independent country.
When the ROC and its government were established, the territory of Taiwan was ruled by Japan, not the ROC. This fact proves that the CCP’s claim that “Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory” is a fabricated justification for invading Taiwan.
It was because of Taiwan’s existence that the US government responded to the 823 Artillery Bombardment by dispatching the US Navy’s Seventh Fleet to help the ROC government defend the islands of Kinmen and Matsu. This prolonged the legal status of the ROC, as unlike Taiwan, Kinmen and Matsu were within the ROC’s territory at the time of its foundation.
The ROC is a special country. In legal terms, Taiwan, which came under US military occupation following Japan’s defeat in World War II, was entrusted to be managed by the ROC government.
However, Taiwan has developed the features and status of a nation state, having all the requisite elements of population, land, government and sovereignty. The only problem is that the continued application of the ROC Constitution does not closely suit the real situation. As this is the case, there is no need for independence, but what is needed is an overhaul of its national institutions.
In commemorating the 823 Artillery Bombardment, there is no need to state once again that it was the reason behind Taiwan’s security, and it is redundant to repeat discussions about what differences might exist between the ROC’s effective governance of Taiwan in comparison to Kinmen and Matsu. This is because Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu have become a community of common destiny.
Since they are all governed by the free and democratic ROC, they should unite as one to resist any aggression against our nation by the despotic CCP regime.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.