The Chinese Ministry of Culture and Tourism on Aug. 11 announced a third round of outbound group tour services that would be resumed to 78 countries and regions, including the US, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India and most European countries, expanding the scope from 60 to 138 countries and areas.
However, Taiwan remains off the list.
In response, some Taiwanese travel agencies are planning rallies to protest Taiwan’s ban on tour groups from China.
Writer Ku Ling (苦苓) rebuked the tour agencies, saying: “Are people throwing away their dignity for the sake of a few pennies?”
Supporters of unification with China said that Japan and South Korea have no problem “throwing away their dignity” to lift the ban on Chinese group tour services.
However, this is far from a fair comparison, as China harbors no ambitions to annex the two countries. China is coercing Taiwan, while other countries have their sovereignty unchallenged.
China has always held a gun to Taiwan’s head when it comes to its “one China” principle. Unfortunately, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has eagerly been China’s mouthpiece, promoting unification ideologies. With such dubious intentions, the KMT has always been Taiwan’s biggest internal enemy and only by marginalizing it can the nation have a future.
Chinese tourists are infamous for their bad manners and behavior, such as hollering at the top of their voices or cutting lines. A young Singaporean visited Taiwan two times in three months this year, sharing rave reviews about his experience.
“With the absence of Chinese tourists, Taroko Gorge has become lovelier to visit than ever before,” he said.
Taiwan’s ban on Chinese tour groups is a blessing in disguise.
In contrast, Taiwanese tourists show far better manners when they are visiting China.
With China ratcheting up military pressure on Taiwan in the past few years, Beijing is quickly losing its luster and appeal for Taiwanese. Most people would rather visit countries in Southeast Asia over a country that displays such animosity and bellicosity.
Taiwan should be anything but crestfallen about China’s boycott. Taiwan, for all its exceptional appeal, can always attract decent tourists from other places, such as the US, Europe, Japan, South Korea and Southeast Asia. Taiwanese should also refrain from visiting China, after all, as Confucius (孔子) said in the Analects: “One will not enter a hazardous state, nor dwell in a disorganized one.”
Moreover, low-budget Chinese travel groups usually employ an “all in one” travel and business model. Taiwan-bound tour operators are picked from among travel agencies that have already been designated to operate overseas tours, and have been approved by China’s Association for Tourism Exchange Across the Taiwan Strait.
This means that the business of Taiwan-bound tourism is the most forbidden of forbidden zones in China and neither foreign-invested nor Taiwan-invested agencies can access it. These conditions have formed a franchise in which a small number of travel agencies designated by Chinese authorities exercise an oligopoly over the business of Taiwan-bound tourism, which means that no profit goes into Taiwanese travel agencies’ pockets.
There is no other country in the world like China that would use its own people as bargaining chips. Taiwan does not need Chinese tourists or their money, not to mention that the “all in one” model prevents profit from going to anyone other than Chinese.
The presence of Chinese tourists would only undermine Taiwan’s image, putting off tourists from other countries.
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Rita Wang
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s