There were 2,990 people killed in traffic accidents in 2021, a mortality rate of 0.000124, which is five times higher than in many other countries. Taiwan has been called “a living hell for pedestrians” in a Facebook post.
Today, civic group Vision Zero is to host a march on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei, calling on the government to “return the road to the people.” The idea of Vision Zero originated from the Swedish government’s “Nollvision” launched in 1997, which holds that pedestrians should be regarded as the main subject of transportation (ie, roads are for pedestrians, not cars), and drivers should be taken as the cause of all traffic accidents. Therefore, drivers should be responsible for everything, and they should be trained rigorously.
Over the past two decades, many countries have emphasized that all roads should be more “pedestrian-oriented.” Governments in Japan, Australia, Europe and the US all suggested that the improvement of road planning should be valued more than law enforcement.
However, no matter how much enforcement is done, people would break the rules. In Taiwan, drivers and pedestrians often do not abide by traffic rules.
Traffic researchers found that it would be easier for the government to implement traffic measures after the public has formed a consensus on safety. In addition to law enforcement, it is most important to re-examine road designs. Work could be done to increase the distance between sidewalks and roads, establish pedestrian refuge islands and reduce the length of sidewalks. To have cars slow down at intersections, the areas for driving and the size of lanes can be reduced, and roundabouts can be set up to replace traffic lights. The purpose is to make driving more inconvenient, so that drivers would rather not drive. It used to be believed that traffic congestion should be criticized and that the government should do more to solve the problem, but today, traffic congestion can be considered as a way to prevent more cars from running on the roads. This is an innovative concept worth thinking about. After all, pedestrians’ lives should never be sacrificed only to save a few minutes journey time for a handful of people.
The fundamental problem of Taiwan’s traffic is that the government is not enforcing the rules and members of the public do not abide by the road laws. In the past two months, the situation has greatly improved to the extent that the intersections do not need to be renovated. As long as drivers are “forced” to follow the rules and stop at crosswalks to yield the right of way to pedestrians, Taiwan would no longer be a living hell for pedestrians.
Vision Zero should advocate that pedestrians and drivers are not to be set against each other, promoting the idea that both are on the same side. Many pedestrians have never become drivers, but it is impossible for a driver to sit in a car for the rest of their life. A driver can become a pedestrian at any time and hence needs to be protected by rules. In this sense, “return the roads to the people” is not only for the sake of the pedestrians, but for everyone. Even if people rely a lot on cars and scooters, drivers should maintain their dignity as human beings.
It is hoped that Vision Zero would keep urging local governments to penalize drivers who fail to stop before intersections. This is the first step to solve the traffic problems in Taiwan. All driving lessons should also be required to instruct drivers to be vigilant and stop before crosswalks, and motor vehicle offices should not let anyone get a license if the person fails to stop at intersections.
Jeremy Wang is a physician and a founding director of the Taiwan Association of Family Medicine.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS