Recently, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) proposed a seven-point policy for sports development in Taiwan. I was looking forward to hearing some constructive ideas.
However, I find his proposal to be rather amateurish and hollow.
Judging from Gou’s press release and speech in Pingtung, the so-called “sports gift money” (體育禮金) is the only slightly creative idea. Still, we must understand that every policy has its purpose. In the past, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government issued “sports stimulus vouchers” (動滋券) to rebuild Taiwan’s sports industry after the COVID-19 pandemic. The policy was totally different from Gou’s claim of offering money to school-age children nationwide for sports events.
The former is short-term post-COVID-19 pandemic economic stimulus, while the latter is a long-term investment. Although the sports gift money is not completely ineffective, it would be a waste without a concrete implementation plan in place.
In sports, adults are the most dominant consumer group, no matter if they are amateur athletes or sports spectators. What adults pursue in sports is watching the most intense and exciting games.
Since there is still room for development in the various sports sectors domestically, is the attempt to rashly expand the child market with the use of gift money not putting the cart before the horse?
The rest of Gou’s seven-point policy is a repeat of the DPP’s current sports policies. In recent years, the government renovated the National Sports Training Center in Kaohsiung in preparation for the Tokyo Olympics and launched a “golden plan” — a program including scientific support and personalized training for athletes. All these efforts were key to Taiwan’s best performance ever in the Tokyo Olympics.
The Ministry of Education’s Sports Administration has continued to work with local governments to establish affordable and accessible public sports centers nationwide, and the government also amended the Sports Industry Development Act (運動產業發展條例) in 2021 to effectively encourage businesses to invest in sports.
In addition to the continued growth of the Chinese Professional Baseball League, the soccer, volleyball and multiple basketball leagues are forming an influential sports industry, a result of cooperation among the central and local governments along with businesses, so the DPP cannot claim all the credit.
However, it would not be right for Gou to ignore all of the DPP’s efforts, which he would know about had he done the smallest amount of research.
This is not the first time Gou has made an empty promise thinking he only needs to throw money at a problem. He once pledged to spend NT$10 billion (US$313 million) to produce 100 films, but only made one movie instead.
It is difficult to discern any presidential qualities in this man. It would be a misfortune for the nation’s sports development if he gains power.
Chen Bang-an is deputy executive director of the Democratic Progressive Party’s Taichung branch.
Translated by Eddy Chang.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS