Hon Hai Group founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) is not yet a player in next year’s presidential election — which is taking on the look of a game of chess — yet he is keeping himself very busy with it.
In contrast, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) has been nominated by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) as its presidential candidate, but he keeps running into brick walls.
The KMT’s pawns are scattered and the loyalty of its major chess pieces is doubtful.
Meanwhile, China is acting behind the scenes, deploying its “united front” tactics. Its roughshod methods show how few Taiwanese support the idea of “one China.”
The election chess game highlights the sharpening diplomatic contest between Taiwan and China, with Taiwan’s asymmetric diplomacy gaining ground while China’s fierce “wolf warrior” diplomacy is on the retreat. Both sides are consolidating their international relations and dealing with the issue of Taiwan’s status, which is a leftover of the 1951 Treaty of Peace with Japan, also known as the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
China’s claim to sovereignty over Taiwan on the grounds that Taiwan has belonged to China “since ancient times” lacks sufficient legal basis. Nonetheless, in bilateral relations, China insists on recognition of its “one China” principle and is not afraid to misuse UN General Assembly Resolution 2758.
However, the most powerful legal instrument China could have to gain sovereignty over Taiwan would be for Taipei to accept that it is part of China.
In view of this, China’s interference in Taiwan’s general election is aimed at fostering “fellow travelers” who advocate the idea of “one China.”
Taiwan’s firm refusal to be legally annexed by China, and its insistence on democratic principles and fulfilling the original intent of the San Francisco Peace Treaty have won the support of the world’s democratic camp. In effect, it has established that there is one Taiwan, and that the People’s Republic of China is not a part of Taiwan.
Democratic countries, including the signatory nations of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, have rallied to support Taiwan and oppose China’s attempts to change the “status quo” through military force.
Having run into brick walls in the international community, China wants to use its supporters and “fellow travelers” in Taiwan to win the presidential election, and impose the bogus “1992 consensus” and “one China principle” which it thinks would allow it to inherit sovereignty over Taiwan.
In other words, anyone who votes for a political party or politician who accepts the idea of “one China” would be betraying Taiwan.
In the line-up for next year’s election, Hou, Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and potential candidate Gou all follow the “one China” line. Gou takes it a step further by acting as a relay for Chinese propaganda, threatening Taiwan with the prospect of war and calling for “taking down” the Democratic Progressive Party, which does not accept the “one China” idea.
Gou has no room to maneuver on the board. The only way for him to be in the game would be to team up with Hou as his vice presidential candidate.
If Gou can bear to be the shrimp instead of the big fish, it would give the KMT the “mainlander” element that it lacks in its bid to achieve “unity.”
Domineering as Gou might be, it would not be surprising if he were to settle for a Hou-Gou ticket. As well as comforting the “mainlander pan-blues,” it would also allow KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) to say he has gone all-out for unity.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS