Hon Hai Group founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) is not yet a player in next year’s presidential election — which is taking on the look of a game of chess — yet he is keeping himself very busy with it.
In contrast, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) has been nominated by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) as its presidential candidate, but he keeps running into brick walls.
The KMT’s pawns are scattered and the loyalty of its major chess pieces is doubtful.
Meanwhile, China is acting behind the scenes, deploying its “united front” tactics. Its roughshod methods show how few Taiwanese support the idea of “one China.”
The election chess game highlights the sharpening diplomatic contest between Taiwan and China, with Taiwan’s asymmetric diplomacy gaining ground while China’s fierce “wolf warrior” diplomacy is on the retreat. Both sides are consolidating their international relations and dealing with the issue of Taiwan’s status, which is a leftover of the 1951 Treaty of Peace with Japan, also known as the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
China’s claim to sovereignty over Taiwan on the grounds that Taiwan has belonged to China “since ancient times” lacks sufficient legal basis. Nonetheless, in bilateral relations, China insists on recognition of its “one China” principle and is not afraid to misuse UN General Assembly Resolution 2758.
However, the most powerful legal instrument China could have to gain sovereignty over Taiwan would be for Taipei to accept that it is part of China.
In view of this, China’s interference in Taiwan’s general election is aimed at fostering “fellow travelers” who advocate the idea of “one China.”
Taiwan’s firm refusal to be legally annexed by China, and its insistence on democratic principles and fulfilling the original intent of the San Francisco Peace Treaty have won the support of the world’s democratic camp. In effect, it has established that there is one Taiwan, and that the People’s Republic of China is not a part of Taiwan.
Democratic countries, including the signatory nations of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, have rallied to support Taiwan and oppose China’s attempts to change the “status quo” through military force.
Having run into brick walls in the international community, China wants to use its supporters and “fellow travelers” in Taiwan to win the presidential election, and impose the bogus “1992 consensus” and “one China principle” which it thinks would allow it to inherit sovereignty over Taiwan.
In other words, anyone who votes for a political party or politician who accepts the idea of “one China” would be betraying Taiwan.
In the line-up for next year’s election, Hou, Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and potential candidate Gou all follow the “one China” line. Gou takes it a step further by acting as a relay for Chinese propaganda, threatening Taiwan with the prospect of war and calling for “taking down” the Democratic Progressive Party, which does not accept the “one China” idea.
Gou has no room to maneuver on the board. The only way for him to be in the game would be to team up with Hou as his vice presidential candidate.
If Gou can bear to be the shrimp instead of the big fish, it would give the KMT the “mainlander” element that it lacks in its bid to achieve “unity.”
Domineering as Gou might be, it would not be surprising if he were to settle for a Hou-Gou ticket. As well as comforting the “mainlander pan-blues,” it would also allow KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) to say he has gone all-out for unity.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS